Bangladesh ICT death sentence to Awami League's Hanif slammed as 'politically motivated'

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Bangladesh ICT death sentence to Awami League's Hanif slammed as 'politically motivated'

Synopsis

A Paris-based human rights body has condemned the ICT’s death sentence against senior Awami League leader Mahbubul Alam Hanif — handed down in a trial conducted entirely in absentia — as ‘politically motivated’ and a violation of ICCPR fair trial standards. With three more Awami League leaders sentenced to life, the verdict signals an accelerating legal reckoning that international observers warn is crossing into political retaliation.

Key Takeaways

Bangladesh’s ICT sentenced Awami League Joint General Secretary Mahbubul Alam Hanif to death on 30 October 2025 for alleged crimes against humanity.
The trial was conducted in absentia , raising serious fair trial concerns under international law.
Three other Awami League leaders — Sadar Uddin Khan , Azgar Ali , and Ataur Rahman Ata — were sentenced to life imprisonment in the same case.
Justice Makers Bangladesh in France (JMBF) condemned the verdict as ‘politically motivated’ and cited violations of Articles 6 and 14 of the ICCPR .
JMBF has urged Bangladesh to halt the sentence’s implementation and called on the UN to monitor the proceedings.

Justice Makers Bangladesh in France (JMBF), a leading international human rights organisation, has strongly condemned the death sentence handed down by Bangladesh's International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) to Mahbubul Alam Hanif, Joint General Secretary of the Awami League, describing the verdict as “politically motivated”. The sentence was delivered on Thursday, 30 October 2025, following a trial conducted entirely in absentia, raising acute concerns about due process and fair trial guarantees under international law.

The Verdict and Those Sentenced

The ICT sentenced Hanif — a senior leader of the Sheikh Hasina-led Awami League — to death for alleged crimes against humanity linked to the July 2024 mass uprising in Bangladesh. Three other Awami League leaders were also convicted in the same case: Sadar Uddin Khan, Azgar Ali, and Ataur Rahman Ata, each sentenced to life imprisonment. All proceedings, according to reports, were conducted without the physical presence of the accused.

Rights Body’s Core Concerns

JMBF emphasised that imposing capital punishment following proceedings conducted in absentia raises serious concerns about compliance with internationally recognised minimum standards of fair trial. Specifically, the organisation cited violations of the rights to meaningful participation in proceedings, effective legal representation, adequate defence, and judicial review — as protected under Articles 6 and 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).

Reiterating its unconditional opposition to the death penalty, JMBF stressed that politically sensitive prosecutions must remain free from political interference, selective justice, and violations of due process.

Shahanur Islam, Founder President of JMBF, said: “The imposition of a death sentence following a trial in absentia raises grave concerns about the right to life and fundamental guarantees of a fair trial. Justice must never become an instrument of political retaliation. Those responsible for serious crimes must be held accountable through independent, impartial, and fair judicial proceedings that comply with international standards. No one should be denied the fundamental right to a fair trial because of their political affiliation.”

Urgent Demands to Dhaka and the UN

JMBF urgently called on the government of Bangladesh to immediately halt the implementation of the death sentence against Hanif and to ensure an independent and impartial judicial review of the convictions and sentences imposed on all four defendants. The organisation also urged the United Nations — particularly the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions and the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers — to closely monitor these proceedings, examine allegations of fair trial violations, and engage with Bangladeshi authorities to ensure compliance with international human rights obligations.

Broader Context

This verdict comes amid a sweeping crackdown on Awami League leaders following the political upheaval triggered by the July 2024 mass uprising that toppled Sheikh Hasina’s government. Critics argue that the ICT, originally established to try war crimes from the 1971 Liberation War, has increasingly been deployed against political opponents in successive administrations. The use of trials in absentia for capital cases has drawn particular scrutiny from international legal observers, who warn that such proceedings fall short of the minimum standards enshrined in international human rights law. How Bangladesh’s authorities respond to mounting international pressure will shape the country’s human rights standing in the months ahead.

Point of View

Originally created for 1971 war crimes, as a tool against political opponents of the new dispensation. Trying a sitting party leader in absentia and then handing down a death sentence is precisely the kind of proceeding that erodes institutional credibility — regardless of the underlying allegations. The silence of major Western governments, which were vocal about Bangladesh’s human rights record under Hasina, will be telling. If the UN rapporteurs engage, this could internationalise the crisis; if they do not, it sets a precedent that in-absentia capital convictions in politically charged cases will pass without meaningful scrutiny.
NationPress
30 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is Mahbubul Alam Hanif and what was he sentenced for?
Mahbubul Alam Hanif is the Joint General Secretary of Bangladesh’s Awami League, the party led by former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. He was sentenced to death by the International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) for alleged crimes against humanity linked to the July 2024 mass uprising in Bangladesh, in a trial conducted in his absence.
What is Justice Makers Bangladesh in France (JMBF)?
JMBF is a Paris-based international human rights organisation focused on Bangladesh. It has condemned the ICT verdict as politically motivated and is urging Bangladesh’s government to halt the sentence’s implementation and ensure an independent judicial review.
Why is a trial in absentia controversial in a capital case?
Conducting a trial in absentia for a capital offence raises serious concerns under international human rights law, particularly Articles 6 and 14 of the ICCPR, which protect the right to life and the right to a fair trial. The accused is denied the ability to participate meaningfully, mount an effective defence, or receive adequate legal representation.
Who else was sentenced alongside Hanif?
Three other Awami League leaders — Sadar Uddin Khan, Azgar Ali, and Ataur Rahman Ata — were sentenced to life imprisonment by the ICT in the same case.
What action has JMBF demanded from the United Nations?
JMBF has urged the UN’s Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions and the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers to monitor the proceedings, examine fair trial violation allegations, and engage with Bangladeshi authorities to ensure compliance with international human rights obligations.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest Yesterday
  2. 1 month ago
  3. 1 month ago
  4. 1 month ago
  5. 1 month ago
  6. 11 months ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google