India joins UN push to protect global sea lanes amid Gulf disruptions
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar on 27 September 2026 joined a broad coalition of maritime and Gulf nations at the United Nations General Assembly in New York, calling for the protection of international sea lanes after attacks on commercial vessels and disruptions at strategic waterways threatened global energy supplies, food security and trade. The coordinated warnings — spanning speeches from Oman, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Singapore, the Philippines, Djibouti and others — marked one of the most sustained multilateral pushes on maritime security in recent UN sessions.
Jaishankar's Call for Restraint and Free Navigation
Addressing the General Assembly debate, Jaishankar expressed deep concern over continuing hostilities in the Gulf and the targeting of commercial vessels and maritime crews in international waters. He urged restraint, de-escalation and the uninterrupted movement of energy and commerce, while also seeking greater international protection for ships and seafarers caught in regional conflicts. India's position reflects its significant exposure: the country imports the majority of its crude oil and depends heavily on maritime trade routes that run through the Strait of Hormuz, the Red Sea and the Strait of Malacca.
Gulf Nations Warn of Hormuz Paralysis
Oman's Foreign Minister Sayyid Badr bin Hamad bin Hamood Albusaidi said a recent regional war had paralysed navigation and trade through the Strait of Hormuz, affecting energy security, price stability and confidence in the international order. He reaffirmed Oman's commitment to safeguarding navigation through the strait under international law and the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), urging all parties to cooperate in protecting countries dependent on the route.
Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud directly linked Gulf stability to global energy security and trade. 'Safeguarding international navigation and the resilience of global supply chains is a shared responsibility,' he said. Riyadh also opposed fees or restrictions on movement through the Strait of Hormuz, and rejected the use of critical waterways as instruments of political pressure against other states.
Bahrain's Foreign Minister Abdullatif bin Rashid Al Zayani widened the frame, arguing that maritime disruptions extend far beyond coastal states. 'A waterway is not merely a security issue of concern for coastal States,' he said, noting that such routes carry food, medicine and energy and affect families even in landlocked countries. Bahrain also opposed permit and fee systems for passage through strategic straits.
The Philippines Puts a Human Face on Maritime Risk
Philippine Foreign Secretary Theresa Lazaro placed seafarers at the centre of the debate, noting that nearly 90 per cent of world trade moves by sea with the support of approximately two million seafarers — more than a quarter of them Filipino. She referred to a recent incident in the Strait of Hormuz that killed two Filipino seafarers and injured others. 'Their tragedy reminds us: maritime security is human security,' Lazaro said. 'Open and secure seas, free from interference and coercion, are vital to our security, our economy, and our people,' she added.
Singapore and Djibouti Cite Broader Chokepoints
Singapore's Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan cited the Strait of Singapore as a working model of multilateral cooperation, noting that nearly a quarter of global seaborne trade passes through it. Rules developed by the three littoral states have kept it open, safe and accessible, he said, describing UNCLOS as one of the greatest achievements of multilateral lawmaking.
Djibouti's Foreign Minister Abdoulkader Houssein Omar sounded a similar alarm about the Red Sea, warning that 'any obstruction to the free movement of shipping could seriously disrupt supply chains.' Notably, the three routes under discussion — the Strait of Hormuz, the Bab Al Mandab–Red Sea corridor and the Malacca–Singapore straits — collectively handle the bulk of Asia's energy imports and export flows.
What This Means for India
India's dependence on these chokepoints makes maritime security a strategic economic priority. Disruptions along these routes can raise fuel, freight and insurance costs, delay shipments and expose Indian seafarers serving aboard international vessels to conflict-related risks. This is the latest instance of New Delhi using multilateral platforms to advocate for free navigation — a stance that aligns with its broader Indo-Pacific security posture and its engagement in frameworks such as the Quad. The convergence of so many nations on this issue at the UNGA suggests growing pressure for a formal multilateral response mechanism. How quickly that translates into binding commitments will be the defining question in the weeks ahead.