India at UNSC: Security Council must act now to curb conflict-driven food crises
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
India's Permanent Representative to the United Nations, P Harish, on Tuesday, 26 August, called on the UN Security Council (UNSC) to make mitigating the humanitarian fallout of conflicts its immediate priority, warning that modern conflicts generate consequences far beyond their immediate theatres of hostility. His remarks came at a Council open debate titled 'Food Under Fire: The Security Council's Role in Mitigating Global and Local Food Crises'.
How Conflicts Are Threatening Global Food Security
'Today's conflicts increasingly generate ripple effects far beyond the immediate theatre of hostilities,' Harish said, pointing to cascading disruptions across energy markets, fertiliser supplies, maritime transport, humanitarian logistics, and agricultural trade. He stressed that such disruptions demonstrate how regional conflicts can threaten food security across the world, with developing countries that are heavily import-dependent bearing a disproportionate share of the burden.
What India Said the Council Must Do
Harish called on the Council to facilitate 'safe, rapid and unimpeded humanitarian access' and support de-confliction arrangements in conflict zones. He also urged the Council to ensure that its own actions — including the imposition of sanctions — 'do not inadvertently impede humanitarian assistance or legitimate food and agricultural trade.' Notably, he drew a clear boundary: building resilient, food-secure societies, he said, 'remains primarily the responsibility of national governments, supported by the UN development system and the Rome-based agencies,' rather than the Security Council itself.
India's Own Food Security Record
Harish cited India's domestic policy achievements as evidence of what national commitment can deliver. He highlighted the National Food Security Act, which provides a statutory entitlement to subsidised food grains, and the PM-KISAN programme, which has extended direct benefit transfers to over 110 million farming households, strengthening the economic resilience of small and marginal producers. India's championing of the International Year of Millets in 2023, he said, has catalysed global attention to climate-resilient, nutrient-rich crops as a pathway to diversified food security. 'These efforts, underpinned by digital public infrastructure and climate-adaptive agricultural practices, have enabled India to remain both food-secure and a net contributor to global food supply,' he added.
UN Chief Names the Three Flashpoints
While Harish spoke in general terms about maritime disruption risks without naming specific conflicts, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres was direct. He identified three active flashpoints threatening global food security: the war in Ukraine, affecting grain and energy exports in the Black Sea; restrictions and closures at the Strait of Hormuz — a conduit for a fifth of global oil supplies and a third of global fertiliser trade — which have 'driven up commodity prices, and made availability plummet'; and attacks on commercial vessels in the Red Sea, which are 'further threatening supply chains for food and other commodities.'
UN Proposes Fertiliser Corridor, Awaits Political Will
Guterres announced that a task force led by the UN Office for Project Services (UNOPS), building on proposals first made in March, has developed a framework for registering and verifying ships carrying fertiliser and related products to facilitate their transit through the Hormuz corridor. The mechanism is described as 'time-bound' and focused initially on fertilisers and raw materials, with the potential to be extended to other products. 'What is needed now is the cooperation and political will of the parties,' Guterres said, urging all concerned to 'engage seriously and constructively.' World Food Programme Acting Director Carl Skau reinforced the urgency, warning that 'serious disruptions to maritime trade now threaten to push tens of millions more people into food insecurity.' Whether the political will materialises remains the central question.