US clashes with UNGA president over UN chief election transparency
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
The United States and Russia are in open conflict with General Assembly President Annalena Baerbock over her push for a more open and inclusive process in selecting the next United Nations Secretary-General, with Washington accusing her of “overreach” that could “undermine” the election. The dispute has surfaced ahead of the Security Council’s second straw poll, scheduled for Friday, 22 August, to informally gauge support for the eight candidates vying to succeed Secretary-General António Guterres, whose term ends this year.
The Core Dispute
US delegate Jennifer Locetta, the Alternative Representative for Special Political Affairs, told the Security Council on Wednesday: “The United States takes exceptional issue with the President of the General Assembly’s overreach and irresponsible actions in this process, the sum of which may serve to undermine the important selection process.”
The friction stems from two letters Baerbock sent to the Council. In the first, she called for “transparency”, “fairness”, and “inclusion” — language Locetta said was “insinuating that it [the Council] acted improperly.” In the second, she urged the Council not to consider candidates who had not appeared before the General Assembly. Locetta also objected to an informal audience poll conducted after a town hall hosted by the Assembly in cooperation with Bloomberg, calling it “unfair, untransparent, and unprecedented.”
P5 Solidarity Against Reform
Notably, Russia — which clashes with the US on most multilateral issues — sided with Washington here. Russia’s Permanent Representative Vasily Nebenzya said on Thursday that he agreed Baerbock had overreached. The alignment of the two geopolitical rivals on this question underscores how jealously the five permanent members (P5) guard their prerogative over the secretary-general selection, a process in which they hold veto power over any candidate.
The General Assembly, representing all 193 UN member states, has historically been reduced to rubber-stamping the Council’s recommendation. Locetta framed Baerbock’s activism as a symptom of a broader problem, saying: “The PGA continues a trend of UN leadership fancying themselves as diplomatic superstars rather than Chief Administrative Officers.”
Where the Candidates Stand
In the Bloomberg town hall audience poll — which carries no official weight — Guyana Foreign Minister Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett received 49 votes, the highest among all candidates. UNCTAD head Rebecca Grynspan came second with 14 votes, followed by Maria Fernanda Espinosa, a former Assembly president and Ecuador’s foreign minister, with 10 votes.
In the Security Council’s first straw poll last month, however, Grynspan led with 10 positive votes, one negative, and four neutral, while Rodrigues-Birkett followed with 9 positive, two negative, and four neutral votes. Whether any negative votes were cast by permanent members was not disclosed.
New Entrants Complicate the Field
Two candidates have joined the race since the first straw poll. Ivonne A-Baki, an Ecuadorian of Lebanese descent and former ambassador to the US and France, was nominated by Tonga. She enters as a rival to Espinosa, also Ecuadorian but nominated by Antigua and Barbuda. The second newcomer is Olara Otunnu of Uganda, a former UN Under-Secretary-General and Special Representative for Children and Armed Conflict, who also previously served as Council president during Uganda’s tenure as permanent representative.
The broader field includes former Senegal President Macky Sall; International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director-General Rafael Grossi of Argentina; and former Chile President and UN Human Rights High Commissioner Michelle Bachelet.
What Comes Next
Further straw polls will follow Friday’s second round, culminating in colour-coded final polls where permanent members’ votes will be identifiable by bloc but not individually attributed. A candidate must ultimately secure at least nine votes without a veto from any permanent member to be recommended to the General Assembly. The structural standoff between the Council and the Assembly over process transparency is unlikely to be resolved before a successor to Guterres is chosen.