Assam Assembly Secretariat seeks criminal case details on Akhil Gogoi by July 13
Synopsis
The Assam Assembly Secretariat has formally sought verified records of all criminal cases against Raijor Dal MLA Akhil Gogoi after Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pijush Hazarika alleged in the Assembly that Gogoi disclosed only 21 of 32 registered cases in his election affidavit — a discrepancy that now sits before Speaker Biswajit Daimary.
Key Takeaways
The Assam Legislative Assembly Secretariat has written to the Home Department seeking details of all pending criminal cases against Akhil Gogoi .
The Home Department has been directed to furnish the information by 13 July .
The report will be placed before Speaker Biswajit Daimary for further action.
Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pijush Hazarika alleged that government records show 32 criminal cases against Gogoi, while his election affidavit listed only 21 .
Neither Gogoi nor the Home Department has officially responded to the Secretariat's communication.
The row has added political tension to the ongoing Budget Session of the Assam Legislative Assembly.
The Assam Legislative Assembly Secretariat has written to the Additional Chief Secretary of the Home Department, seeking comprehensive details of all pending criminal cases against Independent MLA and Raijor Dal chief Akhil Gogoi, officials said on Friday, 10 July. The move follows a controversy over whether Gogoi accurately disclosed his criminal cases in his election affidavit.
What the Secretariat Has Asked For
According to officials, the Assembly Secretariat has directed the Home Department to furnish complete information on all criminal cases pending against Gogoi by 13 July. Once received, the information will be placed before Assam Legislative Assembly Speaker Biswajit Daimary for further consideration. The move is being viewed as an attempt to obtain authenticated government records before any procedural steps are taken on the matter.
The Assembly Floor Clash That Triggered the Move
The Secretariat's action comes a day after a heated exchange on the floor of the Assembly between Gogoi and Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pijush Hazarika. Hazarika alleged that Gogoi had furnished incorrect information before the Election Commission of India by not disclosing all criminal cases in his election affidavit. According to the Minister, official government records show 32 criminal cases registered against Gogoi, whereas Gogoi reportedly mentioned only 21 cases in his election affidavit. The exchange triggered a sharp verbal duel, with both leaders accusing each other of misleading the House and the public.
Gogoi and Home Department Yet to Respond
Neither Gogoi nor the Home Department has officially reacted to the Secretariat's communication so far. The Raijor Dal chief has not publicly addressed the discrepancy in the case count alleged by the Minister. Any formal response or rebuttal is expected once the Home Department submits its verified records.
What Happens Next
The issue could generate further debate in the Assembly once the report is submitted to Speaker Daimary. Any decision on the matter will reportedly depend on the official records provided by the Home Department and the legal provisions governing disclosure of criminal cases by election candidates. The controversy has added a fresh political dimension to the ongoing Budget Session of the Assam Legislative Assembly, where several contentious issues have dominated proceedings in recent days.
Point of View
Which is the correct sequence. But the underlying question is sharper: if the 32-versus-21 discrepancy is confirmed by official records, it raises a serious question about affidavit accuracy that the Election Commission, not just the Speaker, may need to examine. Assam's Budget Session has increasingly become an arena for political point-scoring, and this episode risks being consumed by that dynamic before any accountability mechanism actually functions.
NationPress
10 Jul 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
Why has the Assam Assembly Secretariat sought criminal case details on Akhil Gogoi?
The Secretariat has sought the details following a controversy over whether Gogoi accurately disclosed his criminal cases in his election affidavit. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pijush Hazarika alleged in the Assembly that government records show 32 cases against Gogoi, while his affidavit listed only 21.
What is the deadline given to the Home Department?
The Assam Home Department has been directed to furnish complete details of all criminal cases pending against Akhil Gogoi by 13 July. The information will then be placed before Assembly Speaker Biswajit Daimary.
What action could the Speaker take after receiving the report?
Once the Home Department submits its verified records, Speaker Biswajit Daimary will review them for further consideration. Any decision will depend on the official case count and the legal provisions governing criminal case disclosure by election candidates.
Has Akhil Gogoi responded to the allegations?
As of 10 July, neither Gogoi nor the Home Department has officially reacted to the Secretariat's communication. Gogoi has not publicly addressed the alleged discrepancy between the government's count of 32 cases and the 21 cases listed in his affidavit.
