Delhi HC seeks CBSE response on calculators in Class XII board exams

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Delhi HC seeks CBSE response on calculators in Class XII board exams

Synopsis

CBSE's own curriculum committee approved non-programmable calculators in Class XII Accountancy exams back in November 2024 — yet the recommendation has never been implemented. Now the Delhi High Court is demanding answers, with responses due from CBSE, the Ministry of Education, NCERT, and PARAKH within six weeks.

Key Takeaways

The Delhi High Court on 4 November 2026 issued notice to CBSE , the Ministry of Education , NCERT , and PARAKH over a PIL seeking calculators in Class XII board exams.
A Division Bench of Acting Chief Justice Nitin Wasudeo Sambre and Justice Sanjay Sharma listed the case for hearing on 27 January 2027 .
CBSE's Curriculum Committee had already approved the proposal at its 70th meeting on 25-26 November 2024 , citing unnecessary 'cognitive load' on students.
The recommendation was placed before the Governing Body on 26 December 2024 but has not been notified or implemented.
CBSE told the court that it administers 204 subjects and that any change requires fresh recommendations from its examination committee , not just the curriculum committee.
The petition also seeks extension of the calculator facility — currently available to students with Dyscalculia — to other categories of students with disabilities.

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday, 4 November 2026, issued notice to the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) seeking its official stand on a public interest litigation (PIL) that requests permission for Class XII students to use basic, non-programmable calculators in board examinations, with a primary focus on Accountancy. The notice is returnable within six weeks, and the matter has been listed for further hearing on 27 January 2027.

Key Developments in Court

A Division Bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Nitin Wasudeo Sambre and Justice Sanjay Sharma issued the notice after CBSE sought additional time to obtain internal instructions on the issue. Alongside CBSE, the Bench also sought responses from the Union Ministry of Education, the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT), and PARAKH (National Assessment Centre).

The PIL was filed through advocate Nitin Mangla, who argued before the Bench that CBSE had not taken any definitive position on the proposal despite its own expert committee having already recommended the use of calculators.

What the Petition Argues

The petition contends that CBSE's Curriculum Committee, at its 70th meeting held on 25-26 November 2024, approved a proposal to permit basic, non-programmable calculators in the Class XII Accountancy examination. The committee recorded that the existing restriction imposed an unnecessary 'cognitive load' on students. The recommendation was subsequently placed before CBSE's Governing Body at its 140th meeting on 26 December 2024. However, the proposal has neither been notified nor implemented, and no reason for the delay has been communicated, the plea stated.

The petitioners further argue that allowing calculators would align with the objectives of the National Education Policy (NEP), 2020, which advocates a shift away from rote memorisation towards competency-based learning and assessment. The plea also seeks an extension of the existing calculator facility — currently available to students with Dyscalculia under a CBSE circular issued in January 2020 — to other categories of students with disabilities. The continued restriction, petitioners contend, is arbitrary and violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

CBSE's Position in Court

Counsel for CBSE told the Acting Chief Justice-led Bench that the Board administers 204 subjects, and calculations feature in several of them beyond just Accountancy. Permitting calculators, the counsel submitted, would require fresh recommendations from an expert committee covering all relevant subjects, as well as a detailed review of the logistical aspects of conducting examinations with such devices.

Notably, CBSE's counsel drew a distinction between the two internal bodies involved: the recommendation cited by the petitioners originated from the curriculum committee, whereas decisions on examination rules formally vest in the examination committee. This institutional separation, the counsel argued, requires a fresh cycle of approvals before any change can be implemented.

Broader Context and What It Means for Students

This case touches a longstanding debate in Indian secondary education about whether calculator use in examinations tests authentic understanding or merely reduces computational burden. Globally, many education systems — including those in the United Kingdom and several OECD nations — permit non-programmable calculators in equivalent secondary-level assessments. India's NEP 2020 has repeatedly signalled a move toward higher-order thinking, making CBSE's silence on an already-approved internal recommendation increasingly difficult to defend, critics argue.

If the court ultimately directs CBSE to implement the recommendation, it could affect lakhs of Class XII students sitting Accountancy and potentially Mathematics examinations across India. With the next board examination cycle approaching, the 27 January 2027 hearing date will be closely watched by students, educators, and examination reform advocates alike.

Point of View

And the board still has not acted on it. That institutional inertia, now forced into the open by a court notice, points to a structural problem: in CBSE's governance model, curriculum and examination functions operate in silos that rarely synchronise. The NEP 2020 has set a clear direction toward competency-based assessment, yet CBSE's examination machinery appears to be moving at its own pace. The court's intervention may finally force accountability — but the deeper question is why it took litigation to do what the board's own expert body had already recommended.
NationPress
4 Nov 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Delhi High Court case about CBSE calculators?
The Delhi High Court is hearing a PIL that seeks permission for Class XII students to use basic, non-programmable calculators in CBSE board examinations, particularly in Accountancy. The court has issued notice to CBSE, the Ministry of Education, NCERT, and PARAKH, with the next hearing scheduled for 27 January 2027.
Did CBSE's own committee recommend allowing calculators in Class XII exams?
Yes. CBSE's Curriculum Committee, at its 70th meeting on 25-26 November 2024, approved a proposal to permit basic, non-programmable calculators in the Class XII Accountancy examination, noting that the current restriction placed an unnecessary cognitive load on students. The recommendation was placed before the Governing Body on 26 December 2024 but has not been implemented.
Why has CBSE not implemented the calculator recommendation?
CBSE told the Delhi High Court that decisions on examination rules rest with its examination committee, whereas the recommendation came from the curriculum committee. The board said any change would require fresh expert recommendations covering all affected subjects and a review of logistical aspects, and sought time to obtain formal instructions.
Who is currently allowed to use calculators in CBSE board exams?
Under a CBSE circular issued in January 2020, students diagnosed with Dyscalculia are permitted to use calculators in board examinations. The PIL seeks to extend this facility to other categories of students with disabilities as well.
How does this relate to India's National Education Policy 2020?
The petitioners argue that allowing calculators aligns with NEP 2020's emphasis on competency-based learning over rote memorisation. If the court rules in favour of the PIL, it could signal a broader shift in how CBSE examinations assess students — moving from computational accuracy toward conceptual understanding.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 3 months ago
  2. 3 months ago
  3. 4 months ago
  4. 4 months ago
  5. 5 months ago
  6. 5 months ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google