Giriraj Singh invokes Kalnemi to target unnamed opponents
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
A mythology lesson with a political edge: Union Textiles Minister Giriraj Singh on Thursday, 24 September 2026 reached into the Ramayana to brand unnamed adversaries as shape-shifting deceivers — the kind who chant Ram's name while secretly serving Ravana's agenda.
In a post on X, the senior BJP leader recalled the episode of Kalnemi — the demon dispatched by Ravana who disguised himself as a sage precisely when Hanuman was racing to fetch the life-saving Sanjeevani herb for a mortally wounded Lakshmana. Singh's message was pointed: 'Ram-naam japte hue woh Ravan ka kaam kar raha tha' — ('He chanted Ram's name all the while doing Ravana's bidding'). The parallel, he insisted, is playing out today.
The Kalnemi framework: a demon in a saint's robe
Singh did not name the individual or group he was targeting. But the allegory left little to the imagination: someone is performing piety — new costumes, new personas — while working against the public good. 'The public is well acquainted with both your face and your character,' he wrote, addressing the unnamed party directly. The warning carries an almost theatrical finality: everyone knows how the Kalnemi story ends.
BJP's long tradition of Ramayana rhetoric
This is not the first time BJP leaders have reached for Valmiki's epic to frame a political opponent. The party has a well-worn tradition of casting rivals in demonic or deceptive roles drawn from the Ramayana and Mahabharata — a rhetorical strategy that lands powerfully with a wide cross-section of Indian voters for whom these narratives are lived cultural memory, not distant mythology. What makes Singh's formulation sharper than usual is the specificity of the Kalnemi episode: the demon is not a straightforward villain but a counterfeit saint — making the accusation one of hypocrisy and infiltration rather than mere opposition.
No name, maximum pressure
The deliberate vagueness is itself a political move. By leaving the target unnamed, Singh maximises interpretive range — multiple opponents, in multiple contexts, can feel the arrow is aimed at them. It also insulates the post from the need for direct evidence. The minister's constituents in Begusarai, Bihar, and beyond are left to fill in the blank, which they inevitably will — loudly, and in every direction. Whether opposition figures respond with a counter-narrative or let the allegory pass unanswered may determine how far this particular round of mythological combat travels.