Karnataka stands by ethanol blending findings, challenges IOCL, BPCL, HPCL
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Karnataka Food, Civil Supplies, Consumer Affairs and Legal Metrology Minister Rizwan Arshad on Monday, 9 November reaffirmed that the state government stands firmly by its testing findings on alleged excessive ethanol blending in petrol, while sharply questioning the responses issued by public sector oil marketing companies Indian Oil Corporation (IOCL), Bharat Petroleum (BPCL), and Hindustan Petroleum (HPCL).
Addressing a press conference in Bengaluru, Arshad said the matter had come to public attention after the state raised concerns over the proportion of ethanol blended in petrol sold across Karnataka — and he maintained the Centre should have responded with equivalent seriousness, given the public interest at stake.
What the Minister Said
'The oil marketing companies have responded to our findings, but when an elected government raises an issue, the Central government should respond. We are a pro-people government and have raised this issue only to protect the interests of consumers. We have no personal or selfish interests in the matter,' Arshad said.
He accused the oil companies of sidestepping the core question on the actual proportion of ethanol in the fuel blend. 'You claim the fuel is E20, but you have not given a direct answer to this question. Instead, you are talking about technicalities. Whatever has been exposed by the state government and the methods adopted for testing, we stand firmly by our report,' he said.
Rejecting the Blame on Local Dealers
The Minister pushed back against oil companies' references to irregularities at individual petrol outlets. He argued that since the companies themselves describe ethanol blending as a sophisticated, controlled, and automated process, local petrol bunk dealers cannot logically be held responsible for any discrepancy in blending proportions.
'If the process is controlled and automated, how can local petrol pump dealers carry out such blending? The oil companies are attempting to wash their hands of responsibility by blaming local dealers. Petroleum dealers have nothing to do with this,' Arshad stated.
Defending the Sampling Methodology
Responding to oil companies' allegations of improper sampling, Arshad firmly rejected the charge. He said samples were collected strictly in accordance with the law, citing the relevant clause and sub-section governing the procedure.
'We collected three samples. One was handed over to the oil company representatives, one was retained by us, and the third was sent to the laboratory for testing. The representatives of the oil companies and our officials signed the relevant documents. The density was recorded, and all other details were duly documented,' he said, asserting that 'as a responsible government, we cannot act irrationally or make allegations without following due procedures.'
Operation Nikhar: What the Tests Found
The Karnataka government launched Operation Nikhar to test and investigate ethanol concentrations in E20 petrol supplied across fuel stations in the state. Fuel samples were collected from major oil brands across multiple districts, including Bengaluru, Kolar, Chikkaballapura, Bengaluru Rural, Ramanagara, Mangaluru, and Tumakuru.
Laboratory tests conducted through NABL-accredited and ISO-certified facilities reportedly revealed ethanol levels exceeding the mandated 20 per cent ceiling. Arshad also cited the potential impact on vehicles, noting that even premium automotive technology struggles with non-compliant blends: 'Even BMW vehicles, which are equipped with highly sophisticated, cutting-edge engine technology, do not support this. What about the vehicles used by middle-class people, particularly two-wheelers? Can their engines support it?'
What Happens Next
The Minister reiterated that the state government would continue demanding accountability from all concerned authorities. The standoff between the Karnataka government and the central oil marketing companies signals an escalating Centre-state friction over fuel quality regulation — a domain that sits at the intersection of consumer protection, energy policy, and federal jurisdiction. The question of who carries institutional responsibility for blending compliance remains unanswered.