Maharashtra fixes ₹5 lakh compensation for custodial deaths under new policy

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Maharashtra fixes ₹5 lakh compensation for custodial deaths under new policy

Synopsis

Maharashtra has put a price on custodial accountability — ₹5 lakh for death, up to ₹4 lakh for permanent disability — and, crucially, made officials personally liable for recovery. Framed on Bombay High Court directions, the policy removes the need for a criminal conviction before compensation is granted, a first for the state.

Key Takeaways

The Maharashtra Home Department on 27 October 2026 issued a GR fixing ₹5 lakh compensation for custodial deaths caused by police assault or administrative negligence.
Permanent disability of 50% or more from custody torture attracts ₹4 lakh ; disability below 50% attracts ₹2 lakh .
A criminal conviction is not required to grant compensation — evidence such as CCTV footage, forensic reports, or witness statements suffices.
Compensation proposals must be submitted within 30 days of an incident; the state government has a further 30 days to examine them.
Officials found responsible face criminal cases and recovery of compensation from their salary, pension, or property .
The policy was framed in accordance with Bombay High Court directions arising from a 2014 petition .

The Maharashtra government on Tuesday, 27 October 2026, announced a structured compensation policy for custodial deaths and torture, fixing ₹5 lakh as financial relief for legal heirs of individuals who die in police custody due to assault or administrative negligence. The policy, issued by the Maharashtra Home Department, was framed in accordance with directions from the Bombay High Court arising out of a 2014 petition.

Key Compensation Structure

Under the Government Resolution (GR), the state has established a tiered relief mechanism. In addition to the ₹5 lakh payout for custodial death, the scheme provides ₹4 lakh for permanent disability assessed at 50% or more, and ₹2 lakh for permanent disability rated below 50%, in cases stemming from physical or mental torture during custody. All disability claims are subject to strict medical certification and official verification.

What Must Be Established

For deaths caused by assault, torture, or coercive methods, the policy requires the cause to be established through credible evidence — including a magisterial inquiry, medical and forensic reports, independent investigation, witness statements, or CCTV footage. Notably, a criminal conviction will not be a prerequisite for granting compensation, lowering the evidentiary bar for affected families who have historically struggled to secure relief pending lengthy criminal proceedings.

The policy also covers deaths resulting from administrative negligence, citing specific failures such as denying timely medical examination, ignoring complaints of illness or injury, failing to follow medical advice, and delaying emergency medical assistance.

Process and Timelines

District Superintendents of Police or the concerned Police Commissioners must scrutinise and submit compensation proposals within 30 days of the incident or of medical certification of permanent disability. The state government will then examine proposals received from the Director General of Police within a further 30 days. This two-stage, time-bound process is a structural departure from the ad hoc relief granted in the past.

Accountability and Recovery Provisions

If police personnel are found guilty following an internal inquiry, criminal cases will be registered against them. Significantly, the government will recover the compensation paid from the salary, pension, or property of the officials found responsible — a measure critics and rights groups have long demanded as a deterrent against custodial abuse.

Exclusions Under the Policy

The policy does not cover deaths attributable to natural causes, certain natural disasters where institutional negligence is absent, refusal of medical treatment by the detainee, or accidents that occur while attempting to escape custody, among other specified circumstances. All exclusions are formally enumerated in the GR to limit arbitrary application.

The announcement follows a broader national conversation on custodial violence, with India's courts repeatedly flagging the absence of a standardised compensation framework. How effectively Maharashtra implements and enforces this policy — particularly the salary-recovery clause — will determine whether it becomes a model for other states.

Point of View

But its real test lies in enforcement, not drafting. The salary-recovery clause is the sharpest provision — historically, state governments have compensated victims while shielding errant officers — but it will only bite if internal inquiries are conducted without departmental interference. The exclusion of a criminal conviction as a prerequisite is overdue and aligns with Supreme Court jurisprudence on custodial accountability. What the GR does not address is an independent oversight body; leaving scrutiny entirely within the police hierarchy risks the same institutional reluctance that made such a policy necessary in the first place.
NationPress
27 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What compensation does Maharashtra's new custodial death policy provide?
The policy provides ₹5 lakh to the legal heirs of individuals who die in police custody due to assault or administrative negligence. It also offers ₹4 lakh for permanent disability of 50% or more, and ₹2 lakh for disability below 50%, arising from physical or mental torture during custody.
Is a criminal conviction needed to claim compensation under this policy?
No. A criminal conviction is explicitly not required. Compensation can be granted on the basis of evidence such as a magisterial inquiry, forensic and medical reports, witness statements, or CCTV footage establishing the cause of death or disability.
What is the deadline for processing compensation claims?
District Superintendents of Police or Police Commissioners must submit compensation proposals within 30 days of the incident or medical certification. The state government then has a further 30 days to examine proposals received from the Director General of Police.
What happens to police officers found responsible for custodial deaths?
Officers found guilty in an internal inquiry face criminal cases being registered against them. The state government will also recover the compensation amount from their salary, pension, or property — a direct financial deterrent against abuse and negligence.
Why was this policy introduced, and what does it exclude?
The policy was framed in response to directions from the Bombay High Court arising from a 2014 petition, aiming to create a structured, timely relief mechanism. It excludes deaths from natural causes, certain natural disasters without institutional negligence, refusal of treatment by the detainee, and accidents during attempts to escape custody.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 3 weeks ago
  2. 3 weeks ago
  3. 2 months ago
  4. 3 months ago
  5. 4 months ago
  6. 10 months ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google