SC records UP Police report clearing Ashish, Ajay Mishra in Lakhimpur witness intimidation case

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
SC records UP Police report clearing Ashish, Ajay Mishra in Lakhimpur witness intimidation case

Synopsis

The UP Police has told the Supreme Court it found no evidence against former minister Ajay Mishra and his son Ashish Mishra in the Lakhimpur Kheri witness intimidation case — filing charges only against one Amandeep Singh. With 64 prosecution witnesses still to be examined in the main trial and the apex court firmly in monitoring mode, the clean chit is far from the final word.

Key Takeaways

The Supreme Court on 16 July took on record a UP Police status report finding no evidence against Ajay Mishra and Ashish Mishra in the witness intimidation case.
A charge sheet was filed only against Amandeep Singh ; the trial court has taken cognisance.
The complainant, prosecution witness Baljinder Singh , has been given two weeks to file an affidavit in response.
64 prosecution witnesses are yet to be examined in the principal Lakhimpur Kheri violence trial.
The 2021 Lakhimpur Kheri violence killed eight people , including four farmers allegedly mowed down by an SUV.
The next hearing is scheduled for next month ; the Supreme Court continues to monitor proceedings.

The Supreme Court on Thursday, 16 July took on record a status report submitted by the Uttar Pradesh Police stating that its investigation found no evidence against former Union Minister Ajay Mishra and his son Ashish Mishra in the alleged witness intimidation case linked to the 2021 Lakhimpur Kheri violence. The apex court is actively monitoring the progress of the Lakhimpur Kheri trials, which have seen repeated delays.

What the UP Police Status Report Said

The Uttar Pradesh Police informed a Bench comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi, and Justice V. Mohana that a charge sheet had been filed against only one accused — Amandeep Singh — in the witness intimidation case. The police stated that the investigation did not reveal the involvement of Ashish Mishra, Ajay Mishra, or any others in the alleged offence. The trial court has already taken cognisance of the case against Amandeep Singh.

The status report additionally noted that 64 prosecution witnesses are yet to be examined in the principal trial arising from the Lakhimpur Kheri violence.

Court's Response and Next Steps

Recording the contents of the status report, the Supreme Court granted the complainant two weeks to file an additional affidavit in response to the state police's findings. The matter is scheduled to be heard again next month.

Senior advocate Siddharth Dave, appearing for Ashish Mishra, submitted before the Bench: 'I have not been even named in the chargesheet. The trial will wrap up in three months.'

Background: The Witness Intimidation Complaint

The witness intimidation proceedings stem from a complaint by Baljinder Singh, a prosecution witness in the main Lakhimpur Kheri violence trial, who alleged that attempts were made to dissuade him from deposing before the trial court. After the Supreme Court expressed concern over the delay in acting on the complaint, the Uttar Pradesh Police registered an FIR under Sections 195-A, 506, and 120-B of the IPC and commenced an investigation, which culminated in the charge sheet against Amandeep Singh.

In an earlier hearing, the Supreme Court had directed the investigating officer to complete the remaining probe and submit the final report before the competent trial court within four weeks. It had also ordered that the investigation be conducted by an officer of the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP).

The Lakhimpur Kheri Violence: A Recap

The October 2021 Lakhimpur Kheri violence left eight people dead after clashes erupted during farmers' protests against the visit of then Uttar Pradesh Deputy Chief Minister Keshav Prasad Maurya. According to the UP Police FIR, four protesting farmers were allegedly mowed down by an SUV in which Ashish Mishra was reportedly present.

The Supreme Court had previously expressed dissatisfaction over the slow pace of trial proceedings, noting that no prosecution witness had been examined for nearly two months despite the issuance of bailable and non-bailable warrants. It had directed the trial court to make efforts to conclude both criminal trials in a time-bound manner and advised the prosecution to summon more witnesses on each date while dropping unnecessary formal witnesses to expedite the process.

What Happens Next

With the complainant now having two weeks to respond to the police's findings, the Supreme Court's continued monitoring signals that the apex court will not allow the proceedings to stall. The next hearing is expected to determine whether the court accepts the UP Police's clean chit or calls for further scrutiny — a critical juncture for a case that has drawn sustained national attention since 2021.

Point of View

Rather than simply accepting the report, suggests the Bench is not treating this as a closed matter. With 64 witnesses still to depose in the main trial and a history of procedural delays that drew the apex court's displeasure, the real question is whether institutional pressure can sustain the pace of justice — or whether the clean chit becomes a template for winding down a politically inconvenient case.
NationPress
16 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the UP Police status report say about Ashish Mishra and Ajay Mishra?
The UP Police told the Supreme Court that its investigation found no evidence of involvement by Ashish Mishra or Ajay Mishra in the alleged witness intimidation case linked to the Lakhimpur Kheri violence. A charge sheet was filed only against one accused, Amandeep Singh.
What is the Lakhimpur Kheri witness intimidation case?
The case stems from a complaint by Baljinder Singh, a prosecution witness in the main Lakhimpur Kheri violence trial, who alleged that attempts were made to pressure him into not testifying. The Supreme Court directed the UP Police to investigate, leading to an FIR under Sections 195-A, 506, and 120-B of the IPC.
What action did the Supreme Court take on 16 July?
The Supreme Court, led by CJI Surya Kant, recorded the UP Police status report and granted the complainant two weeks to file an additional affidavit in response. The matter is scheduled for the next hearing next month.
What is the current status of the main Lakhimpur Kheri violence trial?
As of 16 July, 64 prosecution witnesses are yet to be examined in the principal trial. The Supreme Court has previously expressed dissatisfaction over delays and directed the trial court to conclude proceedings in a time-bound manner.
Who was killed in the 2021 Lakhimpur Kheri violence?
Eight people were killed in the October 2021 Lakhimpur Kheri violence, which erupted during farmers' protests against the visit of then UP Deputy Chief Minister Keshav Prasad Maurya. According to the UP Police FIR, four protesting farmers were allegedly mowed down by an SUV in which Ashish Mishra was reportedly present.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 months ago
  2. 4 months ago
  3. 6 months ago
  4. 6 months ago
  5. 7 months ago
  6. 9 months ago
  7. 10 months ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google