Should Masood Azhar Suffer Instead of Dying Instantly?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a thought-provoking interview, former J&K DGP S.P. Vaid emphasizes that terrorist mastermind Masood Azhar should endure the consequences of his actions rather than die easily. Vaid's insights shed light on the ongoing battle against terrorism in India and the necessity for systemic changes in Pakistan's security framework.
Key Takeaways
- Masood Azhar is a key figure in terrorism linked to several major attacks in India.
- S.P. Vaid argues for justice over a quick death for Azhar.
- Operation Sindoor targeted terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan.
- Long-term solutions require dismantling the supporting systems for terrorism.
- Pakistan's narrative often obscures the realities of terrorism.
Jammu, May 8 (NationPress) Former Jammu & Kashmir Director General of Police (DGP) S.P. Vaid stated that the mastermind behind terrorist attacks, Masood Azhar, should not experience a swift demise.
“We don’t wish for his death just yet,” Vaid conveyed to IANS during an exclusive interview. “He should endure the repercussions of the terror he has inflicted across India.”
This statement arose following Azhar’s own declaration, expressing that it would have been preferable for him to have perished in the Indian airstrikes that claimed the lives of several of his family members.
Vaid sharply countered, stating, “Let him suffer. He should survive long enough to grasp the pain he has caused to countless Indian families.”
Masood Azhar, the creator of Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), is one of India’s most infamous terrorists, linked to multiple high-profile attacks, including the 2019 Pulwama bombing that resulted in the deaths of 40 CRPF personnel.
The recent Operation Sindoor, carried out by the Indian armed forces, aimed at dismantling terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), targeting establishments associated with JeM.
With extensive experience in combating insurgency and cross-border terrorism in Jammu & Kashmir, Vaid remarked that while eliminating terror camps sends a strong message, it is not a definitive solution.
“This is a prolonged struggle. Until the Pakistani Army and ISI are significantly weakened, terrorism will persist. These operations may instill fear, but to genuinely eradicate the threat, we must dismantle the framework that nurtures and safeguards terrorists like Masood Azhar,” he emphasized.
He also pointed out that Pakistan is attempting to represent the operation as an assault on civilians. “Pakistan consistently denies its casualties and cultivates a narrative of victimhood to evade international scrutiny. But we are aware of our targets—terror bases,” he stated.
Dismissing the notion that the strike was driven by religious motives, Vaid asserted, “This isn’t about religion. It’s about justice. Terrorism transcends faith. The ideology of Masood Azhar is rooted in hatred and destruction, and he must endure the ramifications of his deeds.”
With India’s message clear, Vaid believes that further actions may be necessary in the future unless fundamental reforms are instituted within Pakistan’s security and intelligence agencies.
Point of View
It is imperative to recognize the complexities of terrorism and the need for a robust response. We support a stance that prioritizes justice and accountability while emphasizing the importance of sustained efforts to dismantle the networks that perpetuate violence.
NationPress
19/08/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is Masood Azhar?
Masood Azhar is the founder of Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), a terrorist organization responsible for numerous attacks in India, including the 2019 Pulwama bombing.
What did S.P. Vaid say about Azhar?
S.P. Vaid expressed that Masood Azhar should not die easily but should instead suffer the consequences of his actions.
What is the significance of Operation Sindoor?
Operation Sindoor targeted terror infrastructure linked to JeM in Pakistan and PoK, aiming to dismantle the capabilities of terrorist organizations.
Why does Vaid believe terrorism won't end quickly?
Vaid believes that until the Pakistani Army and ISI are weakened, terrorism will persist, necessitating ongoing strategic actions.
How does Pakistan portray these operations?
Pakistan often frames such military operations as attacks on civilians to cultivate a narrative of victimhood and evade international criticism.
