West Bengal anti-social activities Bill 2026 passed by 176 votes in Assembly
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
The West Bengal Assembly on Monday, 29 June 2026, passed 'The West Bengal Public Safety & Control of Anti-Social Activities Bill, 2026' by a clear majority, marking a significant shift in how the state intends to tackle corruption, hooliganism, and organised criminal behaviour. The Bill cleared the House with 176 votes in favour, all from the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) camp, while 41 legislators voted against and 20 abstained.
Key Provisions of the Bill
The legislation sets itself apart from existing provisions under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 on two critical fronts. First, it enables preventive detention of up to one year for any individual identified as a danger to public safety. Second, it empowers the state government to confiscate property of persons found involved in anti-social offences by invoking the relevant BNS provisions.
The Bill also grants police the authority to expel or bar individuals from entering specific areas if there is reasonable apprehension that their presence could trigger unrest. Additionally, it extends legal protection to police personnel and government employees engaged in its enforcement.
Oversight Mechanism: The Advisory Board
To guard against potential misuse of preventive detention powers, the Bill mandates the constitution of an advisory board that will evaluate whether detention in each individual case is justified. The board will be chaired by a serving or retired judge of the Calcutta High Court and will include two additional members qualified to hold High Court judgeships. Critically, a detainee will retain the right to appoint a representative to argue their case before the board.
What the Chief Minister Said
Chief Minister Suvendu Adhikari, speaking on the floor of the Assembly, justified the need for the Bill by citing incidents of hooliganism and violence that he attributed to the previous government led by Mamata Banerjee and the All India Trinamool Congress (TMC). Addressing concerns over preventive detention, Adhikari said the provision is not intended for 'gentlemen' but for individuals with repeated criminal antecedents.
Political and Legal Context
The passage of the Bill comes amid a broader national conversation around state-level public order legislation and the scope of preventive detention laws. Critics and opposition legislators — who voted against or abstained — are likely to contest the Bill's scope, particularly the property confiscation clause and the breadth of the preventive detention provision. Notably, preventive detention laws have historically faced scrutiny in Indian courts over due process concerns, making the advisory board mechanism a key safeguard to watch. The Bill now awaits gubernatorial assent before it can be enacted into law.