Is the Interim Bail of Sujay Bhadra Extended Again?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a significant development, the Calcutta High Court has extended the interim bail of Sujay Bhadra, the main accused in a major school job scandal, until August 31. This marks the third extension amid ongoing legal scrutiny and restrictions on his movements. What does this mean for the ongoing investigation?
Key Takeaways
- The Calcutta High Court has extended Sujay Bhadra's interim bail to August 31.
- Bhadra has been under bail conditions for five months without questioning by the CBI.
- Restrictions on his movement and interactions remain in place.
- This extension is the third since his initial bail was granted in February.
- The court denied his request to hold a gathering at home.
Kolkata, July 23 (NationPress) - The Calcutta High Court has, once more, prolonged the interim bail of Sujay Krishna Bhadra, the primary suspect in the extensive cash-for-school-job scandal in West Bengal, until August 31.
However, the single-judge bench led by Justice Suvra Ghosh turned down a request from Bhadra’s legal representative to lift the restrictions on his movements, confining him to his residence in Behala. Instead, Bhadra’s counsel sought permission for him to move freely within the jurisdiction of the trial court.
During the past five months of his interim bail, Bhadra’s lawyer informed the court that the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had not questioned him even once regarding the school job case.
Opposing the motion for increased mobility, CBI attorney Dhiraj Trivedi argued that the interim bail was granted based on Bhadra’s medical needs, making the request to leave his Behala residence unwarranted.
Justice Ghosh noted that while Bhadra might want to savor some fresh air, he must remember that he is not currently imprisoned.
The judge also dismissed Bhadra’s appeal to host and interact with relatives at his Behala home, stating, “Anyone can be your relative. For now, only the plea for the extension of interim bail is granted,” remarked Justice Ghosh.
It is important to note that one of the critical stipulations placed on Bhadra was the prohibition of any interactions, except with those involved in his medical care, during the interim bail period.
Recently, Bhadra requested the Calcutta High Court to organize a gathering at his home to commemorate the first death anniversary of his wife and to invite friends and relatives. However, this request was also rejected.
This marks the third extension of Bhadra’s interim bail. Initially granted in February of this year until March 31 on medical grounds, his bail was subsequently extended on March 24 to April 22, and again in April until July.
Now, for the third time, on Wednesday, his interim bail has been extended until August 31.
Point of View
It is vital to approach this case with objectivity. The extension of Sujay Bhadra's bail raises questions about accountability and justice in high-profile corruption cases. NationPress remains committed to bringing you balanced reporting on this evolving situation.
NationPress
23/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the reason for the bail extension?
The bail extension was granted based on medical grounds, and it marks the third time Sujay Bhadra's interim bail has been extended by the court.
Why was the plea for increased movement denied?
The court denied the plea for increased movement as the interim bail conditions were based on Bhadra's medical needs, and the CBI argued against any changes to the restrictions.
How long has Sujay Bhadra been on interim bail?
Sujay Bhadra has been on interim bail for a total of five months, with extensions granted at various intervals.
What are the restrictions placed on Bhadra during his bail?
Bhadra is prohibited from interacting with anyone except those involved in his medical treatment, and he is confined to his residence in Behala.
What was the court's stance on Bhadra's request to hold a function?
The court rejected Bhadra's request to hold a function at his residence to commemorate his wife's death anniversary, emphasizing the importance of adhering to bail conditions.
