BRICS 2026 Declaration condemns Pahalgam terror attack, demands zero tolerance

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
BRICS 2026 Declaration condemns Pahalgam terror attack, demands zero tolerance

Synopsis

For the first time, BRICS leaders have named and condemned a specific terror attack on Indian soil — the April 2025 Pahalgam massacre that killed 26 — in a consensus declaration. With China as a signatory, the New Delhi Declaration 2026 hands India a significant diplomatic win and ratchets up pressure for finalising the long-stalled UN counter-terrorism convention.

Key Takeaways

The New Delhi Declaration 2026 explicitly condemned the 22 April 2025 Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 people .
BRICS leaders called for zero tolerance against terrorism, rejecting double standards in counter-terror efforts.
The declaration urged expeditious adoption of the Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism (CCIT) at the UN.
Terror financing via virtual assets was flagged as a threat to economic stability and the global financial system.
The BRICS Counter-Terrorism Working Group (CTWG) and its five subgroups were tasked with deepening cooperation.
Leaders stressed countering extremism and radicalisation, especially among younger generations .

The New Delhi Declaration 2026, adopted at the 18th BRICS Summit on 12 September 2026, strongly condemned the 22 April 2025 terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam that killed 26 people and left several others injured. The joint statement by BRICS leaders marked the grouping's most explicit condemnation of a terror strike on Indian soil and reiterated a collective commitment to zero tolerance against terrorism in all its forms.

What the Declaration states

The declaration called out terrorism as 'criminal and unjustifiable, regardless of motivation, whenever, wherever and by whomsoever committed.' It explicitly referenced the Pahalgam massacre by date and casualty count — a significant diplomatic gain for India, which has long pressed multilateral forums to name specific attacks rather than issue generic condemnations.

'We reaffirm our commitment to combating terrorism in all its forms and manifestations, including the cross-border movement of terrorists, terrorism financing and safe havens,' the joint text read. The wording mirrors language New Delhi has consistently pushed at the United Nations and the G20, and its inclusion in a BRICS document — a grouping that includes China — is notable.

Pahalgam attack: a brief recap

On 22 April 2025, Pakistan-backed terrorists opened fire on tourists in Pahalgam, reportedly singling out victims based on their religion. 26 civilians were killed in what was one of the deadliest targeted attacks on tourists in Jammu and Kashmir in recent years. The attack triggered a severe diplomatic standoff between India and Pakistan and led to a broad security overhaul across the Union Territory.

Rejecting double standards on terror

In a pointed passage, the BRICS leaders stressed that terrorism 'should not be associated with any religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group' and demanded that all those involved in terrorist activities and their support networks 'must be held accountable and brought to justice.' The declaration explicitly rejected double standards in countering terrorism — a phrase India has long deployed to criticise selective global responses to cross-border terror.

The leaders further underscored that states bear the primary responsibility for combating terrorism and that all counter-terror efforts must comply with the UN Charter, international human rights law, international refugee law, and international humanitarian law.

Counter-terrorism cooperation deepened

The declaration welcomed the work of the BRICS Counter-Terrorism Working Group (CTWG) and its five subgroups, operating under the BRICS Counter-Terrorism Strategy and Action Plan. It called for further deepening of counter-terrorism cooperation among member states.

Crucially, the leaders called for the expeditious finalisation of the Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism (CCIT) at the UN — a treaty India first proposed in 1996 and which has been stalled for decades over definitional disagreements. They also stressed the need for concerted action against all UN-designated terrorists and terrorist entities.

Terror financing and digital threats flagged

Expressing serious concern over terrorism financing, the declaration noted that illicit use of virtual assets and violations of domestic regulatory frameworks 'may adversely affect economic stability, sustainable development and the integrity of the international financial system.' The leaders also raised alarm over proliferating organised scam networks, including cross-border fraud operations that exploit digital technologies, payment systems, and vulnerable individuals.

The emphasis on countering extremism and radicalisation — 'especially among the younger generations' — alongside a commitment to sharing best practices among BRICS countries, signals a broader shift toward pre-emptive counter-radicalisation frameworks within the grouping.

With the BRICS now explicitly naming the Pahalgam attack in a consensus document, attention will turn to whether this rhetorical unity translates into tangible action — particularly around blocking terror financing channels and advancing the long-pending CCIT at the UN General Assembly.

Point of View

However diplomatic, narrows its room for future obstruction on CCIT and terror designations. The question is enforcement: BRICS declarations carry no binding force, and the grouping's track record on turning counter-terror rhetoric into coordinated action remains thin. India will need to convert this textual win into concrete outcomes — starting with the CCIT, which has languished for three decades.
NationPress
12 Sept 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the BRICS 2026 Declaration say about the Pahalgam terror attack?
The New Delhi Declaration 2026 condemns in the 'strongest terms' the 22 April 2025 terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, which killed 26 people and injured several others. It reaffirms the commitment to combat cross-border terrorism, terror financing, and safe havens.
Why is the BRICS condemnation of the Pahalgam attack significant?
It is significant because BRICS, which includes China, explicitly named a terror attack on Indian soil in a consensus document — something Beijing has historically resisted. This strengthens India's diplomatic position on cross-border terrorism at multilateral forums.
What is the CCIT that BRICS leaders want finalised?
The Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism (CCIT) is a proposed UN treaty first introduced by India in 1996. It seeks a universal legal framework to define and combat terrorism but has been stalled over definitional disagreements among member states.
What did the BRICS declaration say about terror financing?
The declaration expressed serious concern over terrorism financing, including the illicit use of virtual assets and violations of domestic regulatory frameworks. It warned that such activities may adversely affect economic stability and the integrity of the international financial system.
What is the BRICS Counter-Terrorism Working Group?
The BRICS Counter-Terrorism Working Group (CTWG) is the bloc's dedicated body for counter-terror cooperation, operating through five subgroups under the BRICS Counter-Terrorism Strategy and Action Plan. The 2026 declaration called for further deepening of its work.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 4 hours ago
  2. 3 months ago
  3. 4 months ago
  4. 1 year ago
  5. 1 year ago
  6. 1 year ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google