Hambantota Port evades LKR 125.9 mn in taxes, RTI reveals

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Hambantota Port evades LKR 125.9 mn in taxes, RTI reveals

Synopsis

An RTI inquiry has exposed LKR 125.9 million in unpaid municipal taxes at the Chinese-operated Hambantota International Port — and the port's own legal injunction is blocking the council from collecting it. With the Municipal Council stonewalling RTI requests and spending public money on private lawyers, the case raises pointed questions about accountability at one of South Asia's most geopolitically sensitive facilities.

Key Takeaways

The Hambantota International Port Group (HIPG) , operated by a Chinese company , owes LKR 125,938,793.50 in municipal assessment taxes as of 31 December 2025 .
The Hambantota Municipal Council issued a Red Notice seeking property confiscation for LKR 85,292,529 in overdue arrears.
HIPG obtained an interim injunction blocking the council from classifying the port as 'commercial' or confiscating property.
The council paid LKR 1 million in public funds to hire a private law firm for the appeal.
A 10-point RTI application was largely stonewalled, with the council citing 'confidentiality' to withhold key documents.

An Right to Information (RTI) inquiry has revealed that the Hambantota International Port Group (HIPG), operated by a Chinese company, has evaded Municipal Council assessment taxes totalling over LKR 125.9 million, according to a report citing official records. The outstanding balance stood at LKR 125,938,793.50 as of 31 December 2025, inclusive of warrant charges and penalty interest.

Scale of the Tax Arrears

Official records cited in the report show the Hambantota Municipal Council had issued a Red Notice to the port management, seeking confiscation of the property under the Municipal Councils Ordinance for an outstanding amount of LKR 85,292,529 — overdue by two quarters. The council subsequently clarified in writing that, despite earlier discussions at council meetings referencing tax arrears exceeding LKR 250 million and Red Notices worth LKR 140 million, the confirmed current outstanding dues do not exceed LKR 250 million.

Port Management Obtains Legal Injunction

The HIPG management obtained an interim injunction against the council, preventing the municipality from classifying the premises as a 'commercial port' and from proceeding with property confiscation. In response, the council engaged a private law firm to represent it in the appeal, paying LKR 1 million from municipal funds as legal fees — a move that itself raises questions about the use of public resources.

RTI Requests Stonewalled

In response to a detailed 10-point RTI application on the tax evasion matter, the Hambantota Municipal Council refused to answer most questions. It declined to provide certified copies of the final official valuation report of the port premises and the Red Notices, citing 'confidentiality' concerns. According to the report, the council also refused to share copies of petitions related to the ongoing Court of Appeal case, interim injunctions, and the procurement process through which the private law firm was selected.

Broader Context: China's Hambantota Lease

The Hambantota International Port has been at the centre of geopolitical scrutiny since Sri Lanka leased it to China Merchants Port Holdings for 99 years in 2017, amid a debt crisis. Critics have long argued the arrangement gave China significant strategic leverage in the Indian Ocean. The latest tax evasion findings add a new dimension to concerns about accountability and transparency in the port's operations under Chinese management. The council's refusal to engage with RTI requests compounds those concerns, suggesting a lack of oversight over a facility of considerable geopolitical significance.

What Happens Next

The Court of Appeal case regarding property classification and confiscation proceedings remains ongoing. The outcome could determine whether the Hambantota Municipal Council can enforce its tax recovery mechanisms against the port — or whether the injunction will continue to shield HIPG from municipal authority. Transparency advocates are likely to push for fuller RTI compliance as the legal process unfolds.

Point of View

While simultaneously spending public funds on private lawyers, suggests an institution that is either captured or intimidated. Sri Lanka's 99-year lease to China Merchants Port Holdings was already contested on sovereignty grounds; the inability — or unwillingness — of local bodies to enforce basic tax law against the operator deepens those concerns. If a municipal council cannot collect LKR 125 million in arrears from a port it nominally oversees, the question of who actually governs Hambantota becomes uncomfortable to answer.
NationPress
8 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Hambantota International Port Group (HIPG) tax evasion case about?
An RTI inquiry found that HIPG, operated by a Chinese company, has accumulated unpaid municipal assessment taxes of LKR 125,938,793.50 as of 31 December 2025, including warrant charges and penalty interest. The Hambantota Municipal Council has issued a Red Notice and attempted property confiscation to recover the dues.
What is a Red Notice in this context?
Under Sri Lanka's Municipal Councils Ordinance, a Red Notice is a formal enforcement mechanism that allows a municipal council to seek confiscation of property to recover overdue assessment taxes. The Hambantota Municipal Council issued one for LKR 85,292,529 in arrears that were overdue by two quarters.
How has HIPG responded to the tax recovery efforts?
HIPG obtained an interim injunction from the Court of Appeal preventing the Hambantota Municipal Council from classifying the port premises as a 'commercial port' or proceeding with property confiscation. The legal case is ongoing.
Why did the Municipal Council refuse to answer RTI questions?
The Hambantota Municipal Council declined to answer most of a 10-point RTI application, citing confidentiality. It withheld certified copies of the official valuation report, Red Notices, court petitions, and details of how the private law firm was procured — raising concerns about transparency.
What is the broader significance of the Hambantota Port dispute?
Hambantota Port has been leased to China Merchants Port Holdings for 99 years since 2017, making it a focal point of debates over Chinese influence in the Indian Ocean. The tax evasion findings add accountability concerns to existing geopolitical scrutiny of the arrangement.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 4 weeks ago
  2. 2 months ago
  3. 3 months ago
  4. 4 months ago
  5. 9 months ago
  6. 11 months ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google