Pakistan uses terror ecosystem as strategic tool against neighbours: Report

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Pakistan uses terror ecosystem as strategic tool against neighbours: Report

Synopsis

A new report catalogues how Pakistan's ISI-backed militant networks — once deployed as strategic tools against neighbours — have drawn simultaneous condemnation from Afghanistan's Taliban, India, Iran, the US, and the EU. The Hamrakura analysis warns that the very ecosystem Islamabad built is now turning inward, making Pakistan both the architect and a victim of regional terrorism.

Key Takeaways

Taliban killed 41 terrorists and captured 62 in Nuristan , linking them to ISIS -affiliated groups backed by Pakistani authorities .
Afghanistan's Defence Ministry said militants infiltrated with the 'direct guidance and cooperation' of the Pakistani military .
India struck terror infrastructure in Pakistan and PoK following the Pahalgam attack in April last year .
The EUAA has documented a 'strong' link between Pakistan's ISI and Lashkar-e-Taiba .
Former US Joint Chiefs Chairman Admiral Mike Mullen described the Haqqani Network as 'a veritable arm of Pakistan's intelligence.' The Hamrakura report concludes that Pakistan's 'terror ecosystem,' built as a strategic instrument, has now turned against Pakistan itself.

As Afghanistan continues to document cross-border militant infiltration backed by Pakistan's security agencies, the Taliban government has once again publicly condemned Islamabad for destabilising Afghan territory — with a new report shedding fresh light on the pattern of state-sponsored militancy that has drawn condemnation from multiple countries.

Taliban Kills 41, Captures 62 in Pakistan-Linked Militant Operation

Taliban forces recently killed 41 terrorists and captured 62 others in Nuristan province, according to a report by Kathmandu-based outlet Hamrakura. The militants were linked to ISIS-affiliated groups and reportedly backed by Pakistani authorities. Afghanistan's Defence Ministry stated that the terrorists attempted to infiltrate Afghan territory with the 'direct guidance and cooperation' of the Pakistani military — a characterisation that marks a sharp escalation in Kabul's public accusations against Islamabad.

Neighbours and Western Nations Raise the Same Alarm

Afghanistan is not alone in its accusations. India has for years blamed Pakistan for cross-border terrorism — for infiltrating militants into Jammu and Kashmir and facilitating bomb blasts and killings across Indian territory. New Delhi has repeatedly presented what it describes as concrete evidence of Pakistani state actors' involvement. Following the terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir in April last year, India carried out airstrikes targeting terror infrastructure inside Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK).

Iran has similarly accused Pakistan of supporting anti-Iranian militant groups that have conducted cross-border attacks. Tehran has also specifically named Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) as a backer of these militants.

At the global level, investigations have reportedly drawn connections between terrorist attacks in Europe and Pakistan-based outfits. The European Union Agency for Asylum (EUAA) has on record documented a 'strong' link between the ISI and Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), according to the Hamrakura report.

US Had Previously Labelled Haqqani Network a Pakistani 'Arm'

The United States has also, in the past, accused Pakistan of permitting the Haqqani Network, Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), and Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) to conduct attacks while American troops were deployed in Afghanistan. The then-US Joint Chiefs Chairman Admiral Mike Mullen stated plainly: 'The Haqqani network, for one, acts as a veritable arm of Pakistan's intelligence.'

A Strategic Instrument That Turned Inward

The Hamrakura report offered a pointed analysis of the long-term consequences of Pakistan's militant policy: 'It is ironic that Pakistan has faced allegations of infiltrating militants into Afghanistan, which it called a source of terrorism earlier. The government in Pakistan set up a terrorism ecosystem as a strategic instrument against neighbours. However, the very militancy ecosystem turned against Pakistan itself.'

The report further noted that 'the institutionalisation of militant networks as an instrument of security policy has made Pakistan a source and exporter of terrorism and cross-border infiltration' — a charge that finds resonance across Kabul, New Delhi, Tehran, and Western capitals alike.

Whether Islamabad will face coordinated multilateral pressure over its militant networks — or whether each affected country continues to act unilaterally — will shape the region's security calculus in the months ahead.

Point of View

India, Iran, the United States, and the European Union have all independently arrived at the same conclusion about Pakistani state complicity. That convergence is historically unusual and should attract far more sustained diplomatic attention than it has. The 'blowback' thesis — that Pakistan's militant infrastructure is now destabilising Pakistan itself — has been argued for years, but Islamabad has shown little structural willingness to dismantle networks that remain embedded in its security doctrine. Until accountability mechanisms, whether multilateral sanctions or conditionality on aid, are credibly threatened, the pattern is unlikely to change.
NationPress
15 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the report say about Pakistan's use of terrorism against neighbours?
The Hamrakura report states that Pakistan's government 'set up a terrorism ecosystem as a strategic instrument against neighbours,' citing cross-border militant infiltration into Afghanistan, India, and Iran. It concludes that this ecosystem has now turned against Pakistan itself, making the country a 'source and exporter of terrorism.'
What did Afghanistan's Taliban say about Pakistan's role in the Nuristan operation?
Afghanistan's Defence Ministry said that militants who attempted to infiltrate Nuristan province did so with the 'direct guidance and cooperation' of the Pakistani military. Taliban forces killed 41 of these militants and captured 62 others, who were linked to ISIS-affiliated groups reportedly backed by Pakistani authorities.
How has India responded to Pakistan-backed terrorism?
India carried out airstrikes targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) following a terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, in April last year. New Delhi has repeatedly presented what it describes as concrete evidence of Pakistani state actors' direct involvement in cross-border terrorism.
What is the European Union's position on Pakistan and terrorism?
The European Union Agency for Asylum (EUAA) has documented a 'strong' link between Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), according to the Hamrakura report. Europe has broadly recognised Pakistan as a safe haven for terrorist organisations.
What did the US say about Pakistan's links to the Haqqani Network?
The then-US Joint Chiefs Chairman Admiral Mike Mullen stated that 'the Haqqani Network, for one, acts as a veritable arm of Pakistan's intelligence.' The US has also accused Pakistan of allowing the Haqqani Network, Lashkar-e-Taiba, and Jaish-e-Mohammed to conduct attacks while American forces were deployed in Afghanistan.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 3 weeks ago
  2. 2 months ago
  3. 2 months ago
  4. 3 months ago
  5. 3 months ago
  6. 3 months ago
  7. 3 months ago
  8. 7 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google