US targets China on 3 fronts: visas, genomics firms, campus centres
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
The Trump administration has moved against China on three simultaneous fronts within a single week, ending visa-free travel for Chinese nationals to a US Pacific territory, blacklisting China's top genomics companies over alleged forced labour links, and designating Chinese-funded campus cultural centres a national security threat. The coordinated actions, taken between 19 October and 29 October 2026, represent the broadest single-week escalation of US pressure on Beijing in recent months.
Genomics Firms Blacklisted Over Forced Labour
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on Wednesday, 29 October added three interlinked Chinese companies — BGI Genomics, MGI Tech, and Shenzhen BGI Technology (collectively known as BGI Group) — to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) Entity List. Effective immediately, US Customs and Border Protection will apply a 'rebuttable presumption' that goods produced by these entities are barred from entering the United States.
DHS said the US government 'has reasonable cause to believe, based on specific and articulable information, that BGI Genomics conducts genetic testing in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR) alongside the government of the XUAR and as a part of its government initiatives.' The department further stated such testing 'is utilised to facilitate the recruitment, transport, transfer, harbouring or receiving of forced labour.' BGI Group is among the world's largest genomics conglomerates, and the blacklisting is expected to disrupt its supply chains into the US market.
Visa-Free Travel Suspended for Chinese Nationals
Separately, a DHS notice published in the Federal Register on 27 October suspends the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) Economic Vitality and Security Travel Authorization Program (EVS-TAP), which had allowed pre-screened Chinese nationals to visit the islands without a visa. The suspension takes effect at 2 pm EDT on 30 October and covers existing authorisations.
'DHS judges that PRC nationals are almost certainly exploiting EVS-TAP,' the notice stated, citing risks including espionage near military facilities on Tinian and Guam, smuggling routes to Guam, and birth tourism. More than 3,000 Chinese nationals used the programme in fiscal year 2025. The proximity of the Northern Mariana Islands to key US military installations has long made the visa arrangement a subject of scrutiny within national security circles.
Pentagon Dismantles Campus Confucius Institutes
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced that the Pentagon had designated Confucius Institutes — Chinese-funded cultural and language centres hosted at American universities — as a threat to US national security. 'It turns out that 80 new propaganda cells across 30 universities had popped up using different names and different charters, but with the same mission: to steal intellectual property and to infiltrate the minds of American students,' Hegseth said in a video statement.
Hegseth said the department had over the past two months 'systematically dismantled every single one of these organisations.' The Pentagon said on 19 October that research security audits at 30 universities had resulted in more than 80 'termination-related actions'. Notably, Confucius Institutes have been a recurring flashpoint in US-China tensions since the late 2010s; Congress first flagged them as a concern in 2019, and several universities voluntarily shut them down during the first Trump term.
China's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said Beijing opposed 'smears and stigmatisation targeting Confucius Institutes,' according to reports.
Context: Escalation Amid Diplomatic Contact
The sweeping actions come even as President Donald Trump indicated that a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping on nuclear weapons had been scheduled — an unusual juxtaposition of punitive measures and high-level diplomatic engagement. This pattern of simultaneous pressure and dialogue has characterised the Trump administration's China approach, with economic and security hawks pushing restrictions while back-channel diplomacy continues. Analysts say the three-front move signals that domestic political imperatives on China policy are running ahead of any diplomatic calendar.