Are US Lawmakers Investigating NASA and FBI Over China-Linked Research?

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Are US Lawmakers Investigating NASA and FBI Over China-Linked Research?

Synopsis

In a significant move, two prominent Republican lawmakers have raised alarms about potential research collaborations tied to the Chinese Communist Party involving US taxpayer funds. This concern has led to inquiries directed at NASA and the FBI as they confront growing apprehensions regarding national security and research integrity.

Key Takeaways

Concerns over CCP influence: Lawmakers are investigating potential research collaborations tied to the Chinese Communist Party.
National security implications: The inquiries raise significant questions about national security and research integrity.
Wolf Amendment scrutiny: The Wolf Amendment prohibits unauthorized collaborations with Chinese entities.
Deadline for responses: Lawmakers have set a deadline of February 26, 2026, for NASA and the FBI.
Impact on future collaborations: This situation could alter the landscape of U.S.-China research partnerships.

Washington, Feb 20 (NationPress) Two prominent Republican lawmakers have reached out to both NASA and the FBI expressing their apprehensions regarding what they view as potential collaborations in research linked to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). These collaborations reportedly involve grants funded by U.S. taxpayers, including a notable award from NASA.

In correspondence dated February 12 addressed to FBI Director Kash Patel and NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman, the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Charles E. Grassley, along with John Moolenaar, Chairman of the House Select Committee on the CCP, expressed their intent to oversee the influence of the CCP on our nation’s universities and various research institutions.

The lawmakers articulated that "Our university systems are well-known as vulnerable targets in China’s ongoing efforts to acquire U.S. knowledge, research, and intellectual property, often funded by our taxpayers," as noted in their letter shared with the media on Thursday.

The letters reference a December 17, 2025, investigative report by the House Select Committee on China and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, which contends that the CCP "manipulates the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to access and redirect American taxpayer-funded research to bolster its military and technological advancements."

One of the case studies highlighted in the report involves Stanford Professor Wendy Mao. The lawmakers assert that while she was conducting research under a DOE-funded award, she was also affiliated with the Center for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research (HPSTAR)—an organization part of the Chinese Academy of Engineering Physics (CAEP), which has been listed on the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) Entity List since 1997.

Furthermore, they noted that "Professor Mao has co-authored at least 58 publications that recognize DOE funding or support, with 31 of those publications linked to HPSTAR since 2013."

The letters refer to a 2024 research publication that acknowledged backing from NASA’s Exoplanet Programme and the National Science Foundation, while also attributing computational resources to a supercomputing center at a Chinese university. The publication "features only Stanford and Chinese co-authors yet explicitly acknowledges NASA funding, which—without an FBI-certified congressional waiver—raises significant concerns about potential violations of the Wolf Amendment."

The Wolf Amendment, included in annual appropriations legislation, prohibits NASA and researchers funded by NASA from engaging in bilateral collaborations with Chinese entities unless specific authorization and certification are provided to Congress and the FBI.

In their letter to the FBI, the lawmakers inquired whether a Wolf Amendment waiver was sought for NASA Award No. 80NSSC23K0265, how many such waivers have been requested since 2015, and what internal processes the Bureau follows when evaluating applications.

They also requested NASA to furnish "all records for Award No. 80NSSC23K0265 including subaward records" and to clarify "what internal legal guidance, memoranda, or policy interpretations dictate NASA’s application of the Wolf Amendment, and when were they last revised."

The lawmakers set a deadline of February 26, 2026, for responses.

Point of View

It’s imperative to approach this situation with a balanced perspective. The inquiries from lawmakers signify an essential step towards ensuring transparency in research funding, particularly concerning foreign influences. The scrutiny on NASA and the FBI reflects a broader concern over national security and the integrity of academic collaborations. It's vital to navigate these discussions carefully, balancing oversight with the freedom to innovate.
NationPress
20 Jun 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Wolf Amendment?
The Wolf Amendment is a provision in annual appropriations legislation that restricts NASA and NASA-funded researchers from engaging in bilateral collaborations with Chinese entities without specific authorization and certification to Congress and the FBI.
Why are lawmakers concerned about CCP influence?
Lawmakers are concerned that the Chinese Communist Party may exploit U.S. university systems to acquire knowledge and technology, which could undermine national security.
What are the implications of these investigations?
These investigations could lead to stricter regulations on research collaborations and increased scrutiny on funding sources involving foreign entities.
How does this affect U.S.-China research collaborations?
This situation may complicate future research collaborations between U.S. institutions and Chinese entities, potentially leading to a reevaluation of existing partnerships.
What steps are being taken by lawmakers?
Lawmakers have requested detailed records from NASA and the FBI regarding specific awards and waivers related to collaborations with Chinese organizations.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 week ago
  2. 1 week ago
  3. 1 month ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 3 months ago
  6. 3 months ago
  7. 4 months ago
  8. 5 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google