Bhojshala verdict: Muslim side to move SC, Hindu advocates call HC order historic

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Bhojshala verdict: Muslim side to move SC, Hindu advocates call HC order historic

Synopsis

The Indore bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court has declared Bhojshala a Goddess Saraswati temple, setting aside a 2003 ASI order — a ruling the Muslim side is now taking to the Supreme Court. With a 250-page judgment, 700 years of claimed struggle, and both sides digging in, this contested site in Dhar is headed for the apex court.

Key Takeaways

The Indore bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court declared Bhojshala in Dhar district a temple dedicated to Goddess Saraswati on 15 May 2025 .
The court set aside the ASI's 2003 order that had denied Hindus the right to worship and allowed Muslims to offer namaz at the site.
The Muslim side, represented by Advocate Noor Mohammad Sheikh and Arshad Warsi , plans to challenge the ruling in the Supreme Court after studying the 250-page order.
Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain said the Hindu side will file a caveat in the Supreme Court and is confident in its evidence.
Hindu petitioner Ashish Goyal said the community had fought for 700 years for the site's restoration.

The Muslim side in the decades-long Dhar Bhojshala dispute has decided to challenge the Madhya Pradesh High Court's ruling in the Supreme Court, after the Indore bench delivered a verdict in favour of the Hindu side on Friday, 15 May. The High Court declared the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI)-protected monument in Dhar district a temple dedicated to Goddess Saraswati, setting aside a 2003 ASI order that had denied Hindus the right to worship while permitting Muslims to offer namaz at the site.

Muslim Side Plans Supreme Court Challenge

Advocates representing the Muslim side alleged that their arguments were not given due consideration during the proceedings. They said the legal team would first study the detailed court order — which runs to more than 250 pages — before filing a petition in the apex court.

Advocate Noor Mohammad Sheikh, appearing for the Muslim side, said, 'We will review the entire order carefully and then file a petition in the Supreme Court challenging the decision.' Fellow counsel Arshad Warsi echoed the dissatisfaction, claiming several points raised by their side were overlooked. 'Our arguments have been sidelined. We will analyse the order thoroughly and then approach the Supreme Court,' Warsi said.

Hindu Side Calls Verdict 'Historic'

Petitioners and advocates on the Hindu side welcomed the judgment, describing it as the culmination of decades of struggle. Advocate Shirish Dubey said the outcome was the result of years of sacrifice, noting that three people were martyred in the course of the movement and several others endured imprisonment.

'I believe that today's outcome is the result of their struggle and sacrifices,' Dubey said. He further stated that the High Court order 'clearly states that Bhojshala is a Maa Saraswati temple built by Raja Bhoj. The court has dismissed the Muslim side's petition. Both petitions filed by the Hindu side have been allowed, and their demands have been fulfilled.'

Hindu Side Ready to Contest Any Appeal

Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, who also represented the Hindu side, said they were prepared to file a caveat in the Supreme Court if the Muslim side moved an appeal. 'Our case is very strong on facts, research, and evidence,' he said, adding that the proceedings had established the 'religious character and religious nature of these premises is that of a Hindu temple' and that it was historically the site of a Sanskrit learning institution dedicated to Goddess Vagdevi.

Hindu side petitioner Ashish Goyal said the community had been struggling for 700 years for the liberation and restoration of the 'Maa Saraswati Temple Bhojshala'. He noted that while restrictions on entry were removed after the 2003 movement, the site had still not been fully handed over to Hindus until this ruling.

What the High Court Ruled

The Indore bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court set aside the ASI's 2003 order that had denied Hindus the right to worship at the site and granted Muslims the right to offer namaz there. Both petitions filed by the Hindu side were allowed. The court's declaration that Bhojshala is a Hindu temple dedicated to Goddess Saraswati marks a significant shift in the legal status of the ASI-protected monument in Dhar, Madhya Pradesh. The Muslim side's planned Supreme Court challenge means the legal battle over this contested site is far from over.

Point of View

Prolonging uncertainty for both communities. The Muslim side's allegation that its arguments were not adequately considered will be the central ground of appeal, and the 250-page judgment gives the apex court substantial material to examine. What is often missed in the binary framing of 'win' and 'loss' is that the 2003 ASI arrangement — however imperfect — had created a working, if contested, coexistence. The legal finality being sought by both sides may resolve the ownership question while deepening the social one.
NationPress
10 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the Madhya Pradesh High Court rule in the Bhojshala case?
The Indore bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court declared Bhojshala in Dhar district a temple dedicated to Goddess Saraswati, setting aside a 2003 ASI order that had denied Hindus the right to worship and allowed Muslims to offer namaz at the site. Both petitions filed by the Hindu side were allowed.
Why is the Muslim side challenging the Bhojshala verdict in the Supreme Court?
Advocates representing the Muslim side allege that their arguments were not given due consideration during the High Court proceedings. They plan to study the 250-page order before filing a petition in the Supreme Court to challenge the ruling.
What was the 2003 ASI order that the High Court set aside?
The Archaeological Survey of India's 2003 order had denied Hindus the right to worship at Bhojshala while granting Muslims the right to offer namaz there. The High Court's May 2025 ruling overturned this arrangement, declaring the site a Hindu temple.
How will the Hindu side respond if the Muslim side appeals in the Supreme Court?
Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain confirmed the Hindu side will file a caveat in the Supreme Court if an appeal is lodged. He said their case is 'very strong on facts, research, and evidence' and that proceedings have established the site's Hindu religious character.
What is the historical significance of the Bhojshala dispute?
Bhojshala is an ASI-protected monument in Dhar, Madhya Pradesh, believed by Hindus to be a temple to Goddess Saraswati built by Raja Bhoj. Hindu petitioners say the community has sought the site's restoration for 700 years, with a significant movement recorded in 2003.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 months ago
  2. 2 months ago
  3. 2 months ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 2 months ago
  7. 2 months ago
  8. 2 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google