Jagan visits Dalit youth's family after suicide over police harassment in Vijayawada

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Jagan visits Dalit youth's family after suicide over police harassment in Vijayawada

Synopsis

A Dalit taxi driver in Vijayawada recorded a dying declaration naming police officers before dying by suicide — and months later, no case has been filed, CCTV footage from the station has vanished, and the family remains without justice. YSRCP chief Jagan Mohan Reddy's visit has turned a local tragedy into a sharp political and accountability crisis for the Andhra Pradesh government.

Key Takeaways

YS Jagan Mohan Reddy visited the family of Kranthi Kumar , a Dalit taxi driver from Vijayawada , who allegedly died by suicide following months of police harassment.
Kranthi Kumar had no criminal conviction ; old minor cases had been closed, yet he was allegedly forced to report to Krishnalanka Police Station every day for nearly three months .
He left a recorded dying declaration naming former Circle Inspector Nagaraju and other officers — but no action has reportedly been taken against them.
CCTV footage from Krishnalanka Police Station is reportedly missing — one report cites a gap from 1 May to 1 June , another says footage for the past 18 months is unavailable.
Jagan demanded registration of a case under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and alleged a 'protection racket' shielding the accused officers.
The family — including three young children — is living in extreme poverty , with no state support reported so far.

Former Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister and YSR Congress Party (YSRCP) president YS Jagan Mohan Reddy on Thursday, 3 July 2025, visited the residence of Kranthi Kumar, a Dalit taxi driver who allegedly died by suicide following months of harassment by police personnel in Vijayawada. Jagan pledged the party's full support to the bereaved family and vowed to pursue justice through every available legal avenue.

Who Was Kranthi Kumar

Kranthi Kumar, a taxi driver aged under 40, had no criminal conviction to his name. Minor cases registered against him nearly eight years ago had already been closed without any punishment. Despite this, he was allegedly compelled to report to the Krishnalanka Police Station every single day for nearly three months, where he was subjected to continuous harassment. Before his death, he recorded a selfie video — described as a dying declaration — naming former Krishnalanka Circle Inspector Nagaraju and other police personnel as responsible for the ordeal that drove him to take his own life.

What Jagan Found at the Family's Home

Jagan met Kranthi Kumar's wife, children, and father, listened to their account of the harassment, and described the family's condition as heartbreaking. He said the family lives in extreme poverty in a small house, with three young children now left without their father. He assured them that YSRCP would provide legal support and, if necessary, fight in court to secure justice.

Allegations of a 'Protection Racket'

Addressing the media after the visit, Jagan alleged a chain of protection shielding those responsible. 'A protection racket is operating in the capital itself. Former CI Nagaraju is protected by the Commissioner, the Commissioner is protected by the DGP, and the DGP is protected by the Chief Minister,' he said. He noted that the incident occurred within close proximity of the Chief Minister's residence, the Vijayawada Police Commissioner's Office, the Director General of Police's Office, and the Home Minister's Office. He said that even after Kranthi Kumar's father personally showed the dying declaration video to the Police Commissioner following his son's death, no action was initiated.

Missing CCTV Footage Raises Fresh Questions

Jagan pointed to the disappearance of CCTV footage from Krishnalanka Police Station as a serious red flag. According to him, two deaths — one custodial death and one suicide — had occurred within a month under the jurisdiction of the same station. One remand report states that footage from 1 May to 1 June is unavailable, while another report indicates footage for the past 18 months is missing. He questioned how mandatory CCTV recordings from a police station could simply vanish and whether no backup systems existed, alleging that the erasure points to systematic illegal activity inside the station.

Demand for SC/ST Act Case and Government Accountability

Jagan criticised the state government for failing to register a case under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act despite the gravity of the incident. He argued that Kranthi Kumar's own recorded statement constitutes clear evidence, and questioned why no action has been taken against those named. This comes amid growing scrutiny of policing practices in Andhra Pradesh, with opposition parties and civil society groups calling for an independent probe. The state government has not publicly responded to Jagan's allegations as of the time of this report.

Point of View

Yet no FIR has been filed; CCTV footage from the concerned police station has disappeared across two separate time windows. These are not administrative oversights — they are patterns. The SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act was designed precisely for situations like this, and its non-invocation demands explanation. Jagan's visit is politically motivated, as opposition visits always are, but that does not dilute the underlying facts. The question the state government must answer is not why Jagan showed up — but why the police commissioner did not act after being shown the dying declaration by the victim's own father.
NationPress
2 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Who was Kranthi Kumar and how did he die?
Kranthi Kumar was a Dalit taxi driver from Vijayawada, aged under 40, who allegedly died by suicide after enduring nearly three months of daily harassment at Krishnalanka Police Station. Before his death, he recorded a selfie video naming former Circle Inspector Nagaraju and other officers as responsible for his ordeal.
Why has no case been filed against the police officers named by Kranthi Kumar?
Despite Kranthi Kumar's recorded dying declaration clearly naming specific officers, no case has reportedly been registered as of the time of this report. YSRCP chief Jagan Mohan Reddy has alleged that a 'protection racket' is shielding the accused, with the Commissioner protecting the CI, the DGP protecting the Commissioner, and the Chief Minister protecting the DGP. The state government has not publicly addressed these allegations.
What is the significance of the missing CCTV footage from Krishnalanka Police Station?
Two deaths — one custodial and one suicide — reportedly occurred within a month under Krishnalanka Police Station's jurisdiction. Mandatory CCTV footage is missing: one remand report cites unavailability from 1 May to 1 June, while another states footage for the past 18 months is gone. Jagan has argued this points to systematic illegal activity being concealed inside the station.
What legal action has Jagan Mohan Reddy demanded?
Jagan has demanded that a case be registered under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, arguing the incident clearly qualifies given Kranthi Kumar's Dalit identity and the nature of the alleged harassment. He has also pledged legal support to the family and said YSRCP will pursue the matter in court if necessary.
What is the condition of Kranthi Kumar's family?
Kranthi Kumar's family — his wife, father, and three young children — are reportedly living in extreme poverty in a small house in Vijayawada. Jagan described their condition as 'heartbreaking' after meeting them and said the children have been left without their father and without any state support.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 7 months ago
  2. 11 months ago
  3. 1 year ago
  4. 1 year ago
  5. 1 year ago
  6. 1 year ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google