Kejriwal disputes GOI claim, cites 1 bn litre US ethanol import
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
A pointed rebuttal landed on Friday, 7 August 2026, when AAP convenor Arvind Kejriwal directly challenged what he called a false official position, asserting that the Government of India imported 1 billion litres of ethanol from the United States in the previous year — a figure that cuts against the grain of India's stated self-sufficiency drive under its Ethanol Blending Programme.
The number Kejriwal is putting on the table
Kejriwal's post is unambiguous: 'This is false. GOI imported 1 billion litres of ethanol from US last year.' The claim is directed at an unspecified statement — presumably an official assertion that India has not relied on US ethanol imports or has met its blending targets domestically. At 1 billion litres, the figure, if accurate, would represent a substantial volume against India's total annual ethanol blending consumption of roughly 5–6 billion litres in recent programme years.
India's ethanol blending push — and the import question
India's National Policy on Biofuels (2018) set an ambitious road map: blend 20 per cent ethanol with petrol by 2025, reduce crude import dependence, and channel demand toward domestic sugarcane farmers and grain producers. Oil marketing companies are the primary procurement arm, sourcing ethanol from distilleries tied to the sugar sector.
But domestic supply has periodically fallen short of blending targets — a gap that has, on occasion, drawn in imports from the United States, one of the world's largest ethanol producers. Whether and how much was imported in the year Kejriwal references is a figure that official blending-achievement data from the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas would need to confirm or contest.
Why the dispute matters beyond the number
The political stakes are clear. If India imported large volumes of US ethanol while simultaneously claiming progress on domestic blending self-reliance, it raises questions about the programme's actual performance — and about the trade arithmetic with Washington at a moment when India-US agricultural trade is under close watch. Domestic ethanol producers and sugarcane farmers, the intended beneficiaries of the blending scheme, would have a direct interest in how much market share flowed to American exporters instead.
Kejriwal's intervention frames the import figure as a contradiction of official claims — a line of attack that opposition parties have increasingly used to interrogate the gap between policy targets and ground reality on fuel and energy.
The government has not publicly responded to the specific figure as of this report. Official blending data and any revision to import duty or procurement rules will be the next concrete markers to watch.