Siang Upper dam protests: 36-hour shutdown hits 3 Arunachal districts, Congress demands project scrapping
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
A 36-hour shutdown called by indigenous organisations to protest the proposed 11,200-MW Siang Upper Multipurpose Project (SUMP) disrupted normal life across Siang, Upper Siang and East Siang districts of Arunachal Pradesh on Monday, 2 November 2026. Schools, government offices, shops and public transport remained closed in several areas, while protesters reportedly burnt tyres at multiple locations.
Where the Impact Was Felt
The shutdown's effects were most severe in Upper Siang district, particularly in the towns of Yingkiong and Geku, where business establishments, government offices and educational institutions remained shut. East Siang witnessed partial disruption, while Siang district itself reported no impact, with offices, schools and shops functioning normally, according to a senior police official there.
Upper Siang Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Magistrate Ashok Tajo invoked Section 163 of the BNSS, 2023 to declare the shutdown illegal. In his order, Tajo stated: 'Such bandh call causes untold misery, hardship and disruption to the general public, including daily wage earners, school and college students, patients requiring emergency medical service, business establishments and daily commuters. Past instances of such shutdowns have led to breaches of peace, public tranquillity and potential damage or destruction to public and private properties.'
Who Called the Shutdown and What They Want
The bandh was organised by the Siang Indigenous Farmers Forum (SIFF) and the Siang Upper Multipurpose Project Affected Area Youth Association (SAAYA). Their charter of demands includes the immediate release of arrested demonstrators, withdrawal of additional security forces from affected areas, and the suspension of ongoing survey activities for the proposed hydropower project.
The agitating groups also sought the withdrawal of cases filed under the Arunachal Pradesh Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, revocation of suspension orders against government employees, and removal of cases against gaon buras (village headmen) who have opposed the project.
Congress Demands Project Be Scrapped
The Arunachal Pradesh Congress Committee (APCC) strongly backed the protesters, demanding the scrapping of the project and the immediate release of all those arrested during demonstrations. APCC president Bosiram Siram claimed the project could lead to the submergence of 27 villages once the dam is constructed.
A Congress leader argued that no development initiative should proceed at the cost of indigenous communities' ancestral land, identity, culture and livelihood, and stressed that the prior consent of project-affected communities must be obtained before any implementation. The party expressed particular concern over the arrest of protesters, suspension of government employees and alleged punitive action against village headmen who have voiced opposition.
Strategic Stakes Behind the Project
The proposed SUMP is envisaged as one of India's largest hydropower initiatives, and carries significant strategic weight for the Centre. It comes in direct response to China's planned mega hydropower project on the Yarlung Tsangpo River in Tibet — which flows into India as the Siang — raising national security and water-security concerns that go well beyond the state's borders.
According to reports, around 27 villages could face submergence, with several dozen more potentially affected. The opposition is largely rooted in fears over displacement, loss of agricultural land and forests, and the disruption of traditional Adi community livelihoods and cultural practices.
Government's Stance and Way Forward
Chief Minister Pema Khandu and Deputy Chief Minister Chowna Mein have on multiple occasions stated that the state government remains open to dialogue with all stakeholders. As part of a consultation process, Khandu held separate all-party meetings with legislators and the Arunachal Indigenous Tribes Forum (AITF), as well as various community-based organisations, to discuss the Pre-Feasibility Report (PFR) and assess the project's viability.
With political parties now formally joining the opposition movement, the SUMP has become a defining flashpoint in Arunachal Pradesh — one that puts development imperatives, environmental protection, indigenous rights and national strategic interests on a direct collision course.