Pappu Yadav demands Gyanesh Kumar be hanged over SIR electoral rolls row
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Purnia MP Pappu Yadav on Friday, 25 September called for the hanging of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar, escalating the political controversy surrounding the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. The remarks, made to reporters in Patna, mark one of the most incendiary statements yet in the growing dispute over the Election Commission of India (ECI)'s recent conduct.
What Pappu Yadav Said
Speaking in unambiguous terms, Yadav declared, “Gyanesh Kumar should be hanged. He should be hanged from an electric pole so that those who steal the rights and votes of the poor, Dalits, weaker and deprived sections learn a lesson.” He further alleged that Kumar had “suffocated the Constitution” and called him “a bigger terrorist than a terrorist or extremist.”
The Purnia MP also demanded that impeachment proceedings be initiated against the CEC, and called on the Opposition to boycott all elections until Gyanesh Kumar resigns. “In every situation, the elections in Bihar, Assam and Bengal should be cancelled,” he said, adding that “they have committed an injustice against 13 crore people in Bengal, Bihar and Assam.”
The ECI Dissent Row: Background
Yadav's outburst came a day after a leading national daily reported that Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi had allegedly raised internal objections over decisions and processes adopted by the ECI in recent months. The ECI comprises three Election Commissioners, with the CEC holding the status of first among equals rather than a superior authority. Decisions are constitutionally required to be taken unanimously, as far as possible — making any internal dissent structurally significant.
Notably, this controversy is unfolding ahead of assembly elections in Bihar, West Bengal, and Assam, lending it heightened political sensitivity. Critics argue the SIR process risks disenfranchising marginalised communities through bulk deletions from voter rolls.
Political Pile-On: A Pattern of Escalation
Yadav's remarks came just a day after Vikassheel Insaan Party chief Mukesh Sahani made a similarly extreme statement, saying he would have shot CEC Gyanesh Kumar if he were permitted to get away with one murder. The sequence suggests a coordinated escalation by Opposition-aligned voices in Bihar, where the electoral stakes are particularly high.
Yadav also invoked Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, saying, “Rahul Gandhi and I have been fighting since childhood. Everyone has the right to fight and speak, and everyone is welcome. We welcome all those who come forward against Gyanesh.” He further alleged that the CEC had the backing of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), Home Minister Amit Shah, and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
Legal and Constitutional Implications
Calling for the death penalty and a treason case against a sitting constitutional officer is legally and procedurally extraordinary. A CEC can only be removed through an impeachment-like process requiring a resolution passed by both Houses of Parliament — a mechanism that has never been invoked in India's history. Yadav's demand for an Opposition boycott of elections also raises questions under the Representation of the People Act, though no legal action has been reported as of this writing.
What Happens Next
The ECI has not issued a formal public response to the dissent reports or to Yadav's remarks as of 25 September 2026. Opposition parties are expected to mount further pressure in Parliament, while legal observers are watching whether the ECI or any party files a complaint over the inflammatory statements. With Bihar elections on the horizon, this controversy is unlikely to abate.