Iran's Ghalibaf warns US bases are 'legitimate targets' amid naval blockade
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Iranian Parliament Speaker and chief negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf on Sunday, 7 June issued a stark warning that American bases and assets across the region have become “legitimate targets,” citing a US naval blockade against Iran and what he described as Washington’s “green light” to Israel. The warning, posted directly on social media platform X, marks one of Tehran’s sharpest public threats against US military presence in the region in recent months.
Ghalibaf’s Warning in Full
“They (US) are neither committed to a ceasefire nor believe in dialogue, and by demonstrating through the naval blockade and violation of agreements regarding Lebanon that they only understand the language of power,” Ghalibaf wrote. He added: “The naval blockade against the Iranian nation and America’s green light today to the Zionist regime turn American and regime bases and assets in the region into legitimate targets. The hand of our armed forces is open, as always.”
This comes amid an active US-Iran nuclear negotiation track, raising questions about whether Tehran is simultaneously pursuing diplomacy while signalling military readiness — a posture Ghalibaf himself framed last month when he said Iran “obtains concessions not through dialogue, but with missiles.”
Israel Strikes Beirut as Lebanon Tensions Flare
The warning coincided with fresh Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) strikes on Beirut’s Dahieh district on Sunday. According to a statement posted on X by the Israeli Prime Minister’s office, the strike targeted a “terrorist headquarters” in response to Hezbollah’s firing at Israeli territory. The action was carried out “in accordance with the directive of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Israel Katz,” the statement said.
Notably, US President Donald Trump on the same day called for “more surgical” Israeli raids against Hezbollah. “I would like Lebanon to have a better life. I would like to see a more targeted attack against Hezbollah. I think it should be more surgical,” Trump said in an NBC News interview on Sunday.
Iran’s Dual-Track Posture: Missiles and Negotiations
Last month, Ghalibaf had laid out Iran’s strategic calculus explicitly, writing on X: “We obtain concessions not through dialogue, but with missiles; in negotiations, we merely make them understandable.” He also emphasised that “the winner of any agreement is the one who is better prepared for war from the day after.”
He further noted that Iran places no trust in guarantees or words, insisting only actions serve as a measure of intent — and that Tehran will not move before the other side does. This hardline framing sits in direct tension with the ongoing diplomatic track.
Washington’s Reading of the Situation
The Trump administration has claimed its campaign of military and economic pressure has succeeded in drawing Iran to the negotiating table on its nuclear programme. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent reportedly said Tehran is now discussing issues that previous US administrations were unable to get it to address — a characterisation Iran has not publicly confirmed.
As both sides maintain pressure tactics, the risk of miscalculation in a region already strained by the Lebanon conflict and Iran’s nuclear standoff remains elevated. Whether Ghalibaf’s warning is a negotiating signal or a genuine military posture will likely become clearer in the days ahead.