Pakistan preacher Mufti Tariq Masood defends child marriage on social media
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Pakistani religious preacher Mufti Tariq Masood, who commands a large following across Pakistan and beyond, has repeatedly used social media platforms to defend child marriage, challenge modern age-of-consent frameworks, and encourage audiences to view young girls through the prism of marital readiness, according to a detailed report by Sri Lanka's Daily Mirror.
What the Report Found
'Over the years, this immensely popular preacher has repeatedly used his platform to defend child marriage, challenge modern age-of-consent frameworks, and encourage audiences to view young girls through the prism of marital readiness. What is often presented as religious guidance increasingly resembles the normalisation of ideas that place children within the domain of adult sexuality,' the Daily Mirror report stated.
In one widely circulated video, Masood reportedly joked that if someone could not find a 16-year-old bride, he could arrange a bride as young as two or four years old. The remarks triggered widespread outrage, with critics accusing him of promoting child marriage and normalising the sexualisation of minors. Masood dismissed the backlash as a misunderstanding, and his supporters argued the comments were an ill-conceived joke taken out of context.
The Pattern Beyond the Joke
Critics and rights advocates argue the problem extends well beyond any single controversial clip. The Daily Mirror report contends that Masood's larger body of speeches — spanning years of defending underage marriages, opposing statutory age restrictions, promoting marriage shortly after puberty, and discussing the physical 'suitability' of nine- and ten-year-olds for marital ties — reveals what observers describe as a deeper ideological position rather than isolated moments of poor humour.
Compounding concerns, critics allege that controversial clips from his speeches frequently disappear from online platforms following copyright complaints and takedown requests, making direct scrutiny difficult. 'This creates a peculiar dynamic: critics are accused of misrepresenting his views, while attempts to reproduce the original material for scrutiny frequently risk removal. Consequently, the debate becomes less about what was actually said and more about competing narratives. Whenever criticism emerges, it is routinely dismissed as part of a secular, liberal, or Western agenda rather than engaged with on its merits,' the report noted.
The Case of Bindiya Kumari
The controversy around Masood's statements emerges against a broader backdrop of reported child marriage cases involving minority children in Pakistan. Earlier this month, the Voice of Pakistan Minority (VOPM) expressed serious concern over the alleged abduction, forced conversion, and marriage of 14-year-old Bindiya Kumari, a Class 9 student from Sibi in Balochistan.
According to VOPM, Bindiya was allegedly abducted from Sibi and taken to Sindh, where her conversion and marriage were reportedly facilitated through arrangements linked to a figure known as Mian Mithu (Mian Abdul Haq). The rights body stated: 'Authorities must establish the facts through a fair investigation. But fairness does not require silence, and an investigation should never become an excuse to leave a child without protection.'
Legislative Response
Bindiya's case was raised in the Balochistan Assembly on 19 October and subsequently taken up by the Senate Minority Caucus on 29 October. Lawmakers demanded her immediate recovery, questioned the police response, and called for greater coordination between the governments of Sindh and Balochistan. The VOPM said her case 'has exposed the gap between Pakistan's assurances of minority protection and the ground reality.'
What Happens Next
Both cases — Masood's social media content and Bindiya's alleged abduction — are drawing renewed attention to Pakistan's legal frameworks around child marriage and the enforcement gaps that rights groups say leave minority children especially vulnerable. How Pakistani authorities respond to legislative pressure and international scrutiny will be closely watched by human rights organisations in the coming weeks.